創造論とインテリジェントデザインをめぐる米国を中心とする論争・情勢など

×
反進化論州法動向>2001年以降の反進化論州法案集

2017年 アラバマ州反科学州決議案HJR78
州法案Alabama House Joint Resolution 78, 2017 Regular Session
提案者Macx Butler州下院議員(共和党District 30),
Mooney, Farley, Standridge, Moore(B), Rich, Ledbetter,
Brown, Wingo, Drake, Clouse, Greer, Gaston,
Faust, Ainsworth, Whorton (I), Wood, Wilcox, Patterson,
Pettus, Ball, Williams (P), Fridy, South, Treadaway,
Sessions, Weaver, Blackshear and Shedd
提案2017/02/23
状況2017/02/23 州下院運営委員会に送付
2017/04/16 州下院運営委員会から報告
2017/04/16 州下院をVoiceVoteで通過
2017/04/16 州上院運営委員会へ送付
2017/05/02 州上院をVoiceVoteで通過
2017/05/02 州知事へ送付

いわゆる学問の自由州法案。
州法案本文

Alabama House Joint Resolution 78

URGING TEACHER ACADEMIC FREEDOM REGARDING SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE SUBJECTS.

WHEREAS, an important purpose of science education is to inform students about scientific evidence and to help students develop critical thinking skills necessary to become intelligent, productive, and scientifically informed citizens; and
WHEREAS, the teaching of some scientific subjects required to be taught under the curriculum framework developed by the State Board of Education may cause controversy including, but not limited to, biological evolution, the chemical origins of life, global warming, and human cloning; and
WHEREAS, some teachers may be unsure of the expectation concerning how they should present information when controversy occurs on such subjects; now therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF ALABAMA, BOTH HOUSES THEREOF CONCURRING, That we strongly urge:

(a) The State Board of Education, public elementary and secondary school governing authorities, directors of schools, school system administrators, and public elementary and secondary school principals and administrators and teachers should endeavor to create an environment within public elementary and secondary schools that encourages students to explore scientific questions, develop critical thinking skills, analyze the scientific strengths and weaknesses of scientific explanations, and respond appropriately and respectfully to differences of opinion about scientific subjects required to be taught under the curriculum framework developed by the State Board of Education.
(b) The State Board of Education, public elementary or secondary school governing authorities, directors of schools, school system administrators, and public elementary or secondary school principals and administrators should refrain from prohibiting any teacher in a public school system of this state from helping students understand, analyze, critique, and review in an objective manner the scientific strengths and scientific weaknesses of existing scientific theories covered in the course being taught within the curriculum framework developed by the State Board of Education.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That this resolution is intended to support the teaching of scientific information and shall not be construed to promote any religious or nonreligious doctrine, promote discrimination for or against a particular set of religious beliefs or non-beliefs, or promote discrimination for or against religion or non-religion.







コメントをかく


「http://」を含む投稿は禁止されています。

利用規約をご確認のうえご記入下さい

Menu

サブメニュー

kumicit Transact


管理人/副管理人のみ編集できます

広告募集中