Brent Small

Gretel & hansel official trailer (2020. Gretel and hansel ending.

TM + © 2020 Vimeo, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms Privacy CA Privacy Copyright Cookies Made with in NYC. This is the first live action Disney film that actually looks better than the original??. Do we really need another quiet place. Eine Legende geht nie unter. Witch hunting is futile. I liked the cinematography in this movie. But the script was horrible. Sorry i prefer hawkeye version more. Gretel & hansel and gretel. Gretel & hansel reviews. Damn. He's wearing his CPAP too... I often feel inadequate on this sub compared to the users who have such amazing familiarity with topics like philosophy and science and can debunk Peterson's deceit on these subjects with ease in long, fascinating posts. However there is one subject in human knowledge I can claim some form of expertise in, but is just hardly ever useful in online political debate, and that's film history. Finally I've worked out a place where I can use it to rebut a bullshit JP claim. I've been thinking about this claim Peterson made in his first Dave Rubin interview for a little while now. He talks with enormous praise about the strength of Disney films Beauty and the Beast, The Little Mermaid and Sleeping Beauty in reflecting age-old feminine story archetypes, but upon mentioning The Lion King becomes less enthusiastic: The Lion King... I've done a lot of analysis of it - it's a little more on the edge because some of the archetypal themes in it were put in consciously, and so they're... more propagandistic in some sense. Rubin and Peterson then give a virtual handjob to their Gamergate-raised audience all over the world by agreeing that 'pure storytelling' can't have a conscious 'goal', which they obviously imply to mean a political one. As Rubin affirms: That's interesting because everything's sort of [got a] goal now, everything that seems to come out of Hollywood... it's a goal first before the story. Peterson then graces the world with one of his greatest hits, ' Frozen is propagander! ' Yeah well [goal driven stories] just [don't] work over time, I mean story's everything, and a story is something that you can't contrive [sic] it, it has to manifest itself in some sense... the story has an internal logic and it's own arc and if you're aiming it at a moral statement then it's not art it's propaganda, and it'll fall flat. Frozen was a good example that was propagandistic right from the end to the beginning far as I was concerned. It was the right propaganda for the time but... no-one will watch it in 20 years I don't think, whereas they'll be watching, well, The Little M ermaid for example [and] Beauty a nd the Beast forever, because they're perfect... Now before I even get to the film history part of this there are so many reasons this just doesn't make any sense. While I take 'goal' to mean a political goal in this context, since Peterson and Rubin don't define it they suddenly seem to exclude fairy tales with obvious moral goals like Hansel and Gretel (don't trust strangers with treats yadda yadda) from their idea of real art (I'm not an expert on the original versions of the fairy tales these respective Disney movies are based on but I wouldn't be surprised if an even basic bit of research into their original text reveals obvious moral codas for their audiences too). Even if we take 'goal' to mean purely a political one (as suggested by Peterson's use of the term propaganda), aside from the fact one could easily describe any number of Bible stories to have obvious political goals, even secular art I know Peterson is on record speaking highly of is excluded from his definition here. Shakespeare's plays explicitly celebrate the ruling Tudor dynasty, with Richard III for instance portraying it's title character, who claimed the throne over an ancestor of the Queen at the time, completely ahistorically as a grotesque villain who the play clearly argues is unworthy of the throne over the benign and heroic Henry VII. It's blatant propaganda and yet as a work of art it's endured to this day and provided fiction with one of it's most iconic villains. Is this not art to Peterson? But getting to the film history part, aside from the fact explicit and implicit political propaganda survives as art all the time, I especially don't think Frozen will fail to do so. Peterson's right when he says Frozen was 'right for the time', as for whatever reason it captured the global popular imagination so much that it earned over $1 Billion worldwide, has generated God knows how much money in merchandising, a soundtrack that topped the Billboard charts for 13 weeks and reached triple-platinum, and most importantly as I'm sure I have to tell no-one is basically a quintessential feature of the life of any under-9 year old girl that has lived in the developed world since 2013. I'm not alone I'm sure in having a very young female relative who goes around to all outdoor events in an Elsa costume tunelessly singing Let It Go - and she couldn't even talk when the movie came out. I can say without hesitation that Frozen is to little girls of the 2010s what Star Wars was to young boys in the late 1970s and early 1980s. And Star Wars is such a good point of comparison I'm going to make a little case study out of it. Star Wars ticks all the boxes Peterson said invalidated a work from being art and made it propaganda instead. It's archetypal themes were put in consciously, like The Lion King, as George Lucas discovered the work of Joseph Campbell while coming up with the story and made an effort to follow the 'monomyth' archetype Campbell proposed in The Hero of A Thousand Faces when scripting the film. It also has propagandistic elements as George Lucas recently admitted that he modelled the Rebel Alliance off the Viet Cong and the Empire off the US forces in the Vietnam War, reflecting his own hippie-era left wing politics (he came very close to directing Apocalypse Now instead of his friend Francis Ford Coppola after all). In fact despite the fact Star Wars is a movie Dave Rubin and every other right-wing libertarian under the age of 50 who love Jordan Peterson all adore, it's been described as postmodern due to the very deliberate way George Lucas pieced it's content together out of older media as well as Campbell's archetypes. Yet twenty-years after Star Wars came out? Those young boys like my own father and so many others who watched it and adored it in 1977 turned out in droves to watch it's rerelease which grossed over $100 Million. The fan culture around it continued to produce and consume merchandise and became a media fixture. And when The Phantom Menace came out in 1999? Just look at these wonderful news clips from the time and tell me how that 20 year old film's sequel wasn't hyped to the fucking stratosphere. Just like when The Force Awakens came out in 2015 fans lined the streets queuing up to continue the cultural experience they'd begun as children and that still meant so much to them. In 2018 none of this frenzy around Star Wars from the people who grew up with it has gone away. Generations post Gen-X are still growing up with it and have also decided to ruin it by making it yet another battlefield in their culture war because some neoliberal Disney execs decided to put women and minorities in it or something. So tell me, tell me, TELL ME Jordan Peterson, why the fuck won't this happen with Frozen? From any analysis of business or popular culture it would be insanity if something with the cultural impact of Frozen wouldn't be remembered in 20 years time, in fact I'll make you a counter prediction Jordan. In 20 years I see Frozen being the same nostalgic touchstone for Gen Alpha and late Gen Z girls and onward in the same way Star Wars has been to Gen Z males. These future women will show it to their kids, and those kids will enjoy it just the same, they might even give it the same retro cool that films of parents' generations always receive (the sort now being enjoyed by movies like The Breakfast Club, Back To The Future and Labyrinth). Just like vintage Star Wars toys now, vintage Frozen toys will become classic collector's items that'll fetch ridiculous amounts of money, and maybe fans will also fight over rereleases and sequels in the same groan-inducing way the Star Wars fans do. If you genuinely can't see this happening, I really want to talk to you, I want to see what sort of cloudcuckoolander could look at all of these signs and not think Frozen will still be a massive deal in the popular culture of the developed world in 20, 30 and 40 years time (If we're still alive). Obviously Jordan Peterson is one of these cloudcuckoolanders, and I wouldn't trust him on any kind of decisions regarding long term financial investments if I were you.
Gretel & hansel 2 game. All violent and macabre. sheesh. Good to see Elijah Wood at least.

Gretel & 26 hansel and gretel. Lmao loads of these movie's have got major flops written all over them.

Gretel & hansel (2020) trailer. AHHHH I CANT WAIT IM SO HYPED FOR THIS. That lady menacingly shaking Maracas at 3:09 has a ferocity in her energy I aspire to have one day lmao. Gretel & hansel review. Why don't they just call it Gretel since she's the main character? Why are they pretending that this is another Hansel and Gretel adaptation by just rearranging the title of the story.

4.7 / 5

Votes: 759