Tameka Liebowitz

*
?? ???????
??
?? ???????

&ref(https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMWM4NDg0NDEtNDAwNi00ZjU4LWE5ZTYtOTc5YmQzYjFkYTY0XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNTE2MDEyODM@._V1_UY113_CR0,0,76,113_AL_.jpg); Release Date - 2020; synopsis - One of the greatest miracles in the Bible is Moses and the Israelites trapped at the sea by Pharaoh's army, when God miraculously parts the waters, but is there any evidence that it really happened, and if so, where?; USA; 25 vote. Patterns of evidence: the red sea miracle download full version. Patterns of evidence: the red sea miracle download full album. Published: 10 February 2020 (GMT+10) Atheists often attack the truth of the Bible by claiming there is no evidence of biblical events that should have left evidence, such as the Israelites in Egypt and the Exodus. Tim Mahoney’s excellent Patterns of Evidence series (see the reviews of the first two films entitled Exodus and The Moses Controversy) have laid out an argument that some scholars do not see the evidences of biblical history because they are not looking for evidence of any Hebrew occupation or are interpreting evidence incorrectly by assigning it to the wrong times. The latest installment, Patterns of Evidence: The Red Sea Miracle continues this trend. God’s miraculous deliverance of Israel from Egypt including the plagues on Egypt and the parting of the Red Sea was foundational to Israel’s identity as a nation in covenant with Yahweh and their understanding of who God was. These miracles were also of such great magnitude that even the Canaanites remembered it a generation later (Joshua 2:10). But nearly every geographical location surrounding the event is contested?particularly the site of the crossing itself, and the route Israel took to get there. Using the personal, engaging format of the previous documentaries, Mahoney speaks with experts representing all the major views. In this film, they are divided into the ‘Egyptian view’, that tends to view the population of Israel, the distance traveled, and the scale of the Red Sea miracle as smaller, and sometimes a naturalistic event, rather than the supernatural intervention of God. Then he explains what he terms as the ‘Hebrew view’, which views the population, distance, and scale of the miracle as larger. While this characterization might seem simplistic, it is accurate enough for the purposes of the documentary, and makes the debate much more understandable for the ‘uninitiated’ viewer. Size of the Israelite population A ‘literal’ translation of the Hebrew text is that the Exodus consisted of 650, 000 men plus women and children, meaning around 2 million people. But the Egyptian view argues that the word translated ‘thousand’ (elef) may also have the non-literal meaning ‘family group’, bringing the numbers down to several thousand, not millions. Mahoney does a particularly good job giving the Egyptian view scholars a fair representation, including OT scholar Barry Beitzel who had a good amount of screen time to argue for his understanding. But Mahoney also does a good job of presenting a compelling case for understanding “thousand” literally, using the principle of Scripture to interpret Scripture. Red Sea or Reed Sea? The Hebrew term for the body of water that the Israelites crossed on dry land is Yam Suph. We translate that term as “Red Sea” based on the Greek translation of the Old Testament, the Septuagint. But Mahoney argues persuasively that the actual meaning is “Reed Sea”. Martin Luther also reflected this understanding when he used the German Schilfmeer, which means “sea of reeds”. It is necessary to pre-empt a possible skeptical attack here, because Acts 7:36 and Hebrews 11:29 use the Septuagintal Greek term for Red Sea. If the Hebrew was “Reed Sea”, and the Septuagint translators got it wrong, then the New Testament would be in error for using that term. How do we defend the NT usage if Yam Suph means “Reed Sea”? The simple answer is that place names change over time, and updates to reflect later designations are common in Scripture. Yam Suph was the correct name at the time of Moses, and Red Sea reflected the Greek name in usage at the time of the Septuagint translation and the New Testament. We see this elsewhere in Egypt where Avaris, the Hyksos capital, was later built over and renamed Ramses and even Pi-Ramses, which is what we read in our Bibles today. The crossing site? There are three major candidates for the general area of the Red Sea Crossing Some people argue that north of the Red Sea, there are some relatively shallow bodies of water that qualify. The Gulf of Suez is the major traditional crossing site, with most traditional Christian commentators supporting it. The Gulf of Aqaba is a site that is gaining popularity, especially among some researchers outside the mainstream archaeological community. There are three places in the Gulf of Aqaba where the crossing could have possibly happened. Closely linked to this is the route Israel took to get there. The discussion of how fast people and herds could possibly travel and the implications for the crossing site is particularly enlightening. A high-quality visual masterpiece Often, biblical debates can be confusing and difficult to understand for those new to the subject. And there are those who feel that they have settled these matters in their own minds and are perhaps resistant to other views. But Mahoney walks the viewer through the various options in a way that is very understandable and leaves one feeling like they have the information necessary to form their own well-informed opinion. The production value is also very high, with stunning video and graphics. Why does it matter? For Mahoney, this isn’t just a dry academic discussion. He stated in previous Patterns of Evidence installments that he needed answers to these questions for his own faith, and in this film he says that he wants to have answers for his grandchildren. This drives it home that the Bible’s history matters, and we should want to be able to defend it with all the tools at our disposal. Patterns of Evidence: The Red Sea Miracle adds several arguments that we can use to defend the Bible’s history and does much to build our faith in the accuracy of the Bible’s account. For those who’ve had some doubts about God’s parting of the Red/Reed sea, this film should be a faith-building encounter at the greatness of our God. After all, if He is the one that created this massive universe, why should parting a body of water on the earth, regardless of its size, be so difficult? We heartily recommend Patterns of Evidence: The Red Sea Miracle.
Coming in early 2020 is the next chapter of the Patterns of Evidence film series, with back-to-back parts covering two dramatically different approaches in reading the biblical text. One approach is Egyptian, the other is Hebrew. Stay tuned for updates as we bring this film to Perth ? SEE FIRST SNEAK PEEK TRAILER OF THE NEW RED SEA MIRACLE FILMS Patterns of Evidence: The Red Sea Miracle Part 1 & 2 Tim Mahoney investigates one of the greatest miracles of the Bible. Did a mighty sea split? What secrets will be revealed? After leaving Egypt, the Bible describes the Israelites crossing a deep sea that was miraculously split with walls of water on their right and left. When the Egyptians and their chariot force pursued, the water came crashing back down to destroy the entire army. Are miracles of this kind even possible? Skeptics contend that no evidence has ever been found for huge numbers of people crossing the wilderness or a mighty sea. Does the lack of evidence at the traditional sites mean the events didn’t happen, or might we have been looking in wrong places all along? Join Timothy Mahoney in the next chapter of the series as he retraces the steps of Moses and the Israelites, looking for answers in Patterns of Evidence: The Red Sea Miracle Part 1 & 2. Hear ideas from all sides of the debate as you journey back to the lands of the Bible in search of answers to one of the Bible’s biggest mysteries; where is the lost sea of the Exodus, and what really happened there? Can a patterns approach help to solve the problem?
What if we need to correct our interpretation of the Biblical Chronology? Please read on to the dates listed below, and note the Bible references. This is an Excellent DVD, presenting secular historical evidence, educating the public as to why there is a controversy over the existence of the nation of Israel in ancient Egypt and the exodus, as well as matching up the patterns from the Bible to the patterns of ancient Egyptian history.? Just like Mr Mahoney said,? “For 50 years, all the books, all the television programs, and all the university professors whove been convincing the world to dismiss the Bible (such as the events of the Exodus) have been doing so based mainly on this one issue, Chronology!” Mr Mahoney correctly suggested to shift the Biblical chronology based on 1 Kings 6, where 480 years is indicated as the time span between the Exodus to the building of the temple, such that the Exodus could move years earlier to about 1450 BC.? Mr Mahoney also suggested to shift the Egyptians chronology to overlap with the above Biblical chronology. This was assuming that the interpretation of the conventional Biblical chronology is correct, that the sojourn of ancient Israel in Egypt was 217 years. But what if we re-check our current interpretation of the Biblical chronology and find there needs to be a correction? Edwin R. Thiele, in his book The Mysterious Numbers of the Hebrew Kings, established the date of the death of Solomon and the division of the kingdom as 931 BC. If we work our way back from here, this is what we get: 931 BC the death of Solomon and the division of the kingdom. 967 BC the construction of the temple began. Solomon reigned 40 years (I Kings 11:42 ) and began to build the temple in the fourth year of his reign (I Kings 6:1. ? 480 years is indicated as the time span between the Exodus to the building of the temple. (I Kings 6:1) 1447 BC The Exodus 430 years sojourn after Jacobs family arrives in Egypt (Ex 12:40 -41, Gal 3:17 ) 480 years is indicated as the time span between the Exodus to the building of the temple. (I Kings 6:1) 1847 BC Affliction on Israel Begins the 400 year affliction begins 30 years after Jacobs family arrives in Egypt (Gen 15:13, Act 7:6) 1877 BC Jacobs family arrives in Egypt This occurs when Jacob is 130, Joseph is 39, and the famine has 5 more years (Gen 45:6, Gen 47:9) 430 years sojourn after Jacobs family arrives in Egypt (Ex 12:40 -41, Gal 3:17 ) 1879 BC The 7 years of famine begin (Gen 45:6) 1886 BC The 7 years of plenty begin, Joseph is 30 (Gen 41:46, Gen 45:6) 1916 BC Jacob 91, Birth of Joseph (Gen 41:46 ) 2007 BC Birth of Jacob (Gen. 25:26, Gen 47:9) If we let the Bible speak for itself, that the sojourn of Israel in Egypt was exactly 430 years (Gen 15:13 ) and over 4 generations from Levi to Kohath to Amram to Aaron (Gen 15:16. instead of the conventional belief of 217 years, this fits rather nicely that Jacobs arrival occurred in the Middle Kingdom, matching the pattern of evidence found in archaeology. Darryl.
Patterns of evidence the red sea miracle download full album. The sea is parted 96 King s will answer tonight the Faro's lose once again for keeping us slaves no more Moses Spirit. Patterns of evidence: the red sea miracle download full song. To God be the Glory ?? Amen.