*
¢§¢§¢§¢§¢§¢§¢§¢§¢§¢§
STREAM; WATCH
??????????
Creator: Michael Pack. Directed by: Michael Pack. actor: Ginni Thomas. &ref(https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMjVlNWUwZmUtOTg1MC00ZWZmLWE3YzAtN2QzMzgwNDZjZTM3XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMjI5Nzc3NjE@._V1_UY113_CR0,0,76,113_AL_.jpg). User rating: 8,5 / 10 Stars. USA. Same southern democrats who fought a civil war to keep slavery legal still don't like it when a black man breaks free from their plantation. They'll give you food and shelter and all they demand in return is your heart, mind, and soul. Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words free.
¦§ ¦Ê¦Á¦Ñ¦Éέ¦Ñ¦Á ¦Ó¦Ï¦Ô Clarence Thomas ¦Ò¦Ó¦Ç ¦Ä¦É¦Ê¦Ç¦Ã¦Ï¦Ñί¦Á ¦Ê¦Á¦É ¦Ó¦Ç ¦Ð¦Ï¦Ë¦É¦Ó¦É¦Êή. Έ¦Í¦Á ¦Íέ¦Ï ¦Í¦Ó¦Ï¦Ê¦É¦Ì¦Á¦Í¦Óέ¦Ñ έ¦Ñ¦Ö¦Å¦Ó¦Á¦É ¦Ì¦Å ¦Ó¦Ï Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words. ¦³¦Ï ¦Å¦Ðί¦Ò¦Ç¦Ì¦Ï ¦Í¦Ó¦Ï¦Ê¦É¦Ì¦Á¦Í¦Óέ¦Ñ ¦Ê¦Ô¦Ê¦Ë¦Ï¦Õό¦Ñ¦Ç¦Ò¦Å. ¦¤¦Åί¦Ó¦Å ¦Ó¦Ï. ¦¤¦É¦Á¦Âά¦Ò¦Ó¦Å ¦Å¦Ðί¦Ò¦Çς ¦¥¦Ð¦É¦Êί¦Í¦Ä¦Ô¦Í¦Á stunts ¦Ò¦Ó¦Ï ?Elba Vs. Block? ¦°¦Ï¦É¦Ïς ¦Åί¦Í¦Á¦É ¦Ï ¦Ê¦Á¦Ëύ¦Ó¦Å¦Ñ¦Ïς ¦Ðί¦Ò¦Ø ¦Á¦Ð¡Ç¦Ó¦Ï ¦Ó¦É¦Ìό¦Í¦É; ¦¡¦Ô¦Óό ¦Á¦Í¦Á¦Ñ¦Ø¦Ó¦Éέ¦Ó¦Á¦É ¦Ó¦Ï Elba Vs. Block ¦Ð¦Ï¦Ô ¦Ó¦Ï¦Ôς ¦Âά¦Æ¦Å¦É ¦Ò¦Å ¦Á¦Í¦Ó¦Á¦Ã¦Ø¦Í¦É¦Ò¦Ìό. ¦³¦Ï ¦Ð¦Ñώ¦Ó¦Ï teaser ¦Ê¦Ô¦Ê¦Ë¦Ï¦Õό¦Ñ¦Ç¦Ò¦Å. ¦¤¦Åί¦Ó¦Å ¦Ó¦Ï. I can't believe she was offended by the pubic hair in my coke thing. My wife thought it was hilarious. Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words movie. Story highlights High court's lone African-American justice ruled against civil rights pillar Conservative majority's decision strikes at heart of 1965 Voting Rights Act Questions about Clarence Thomas persist even after two decades on the Supreme Court Among them: Why does he condemn affirmative action if he benefited from it? He wore a black beret and Army fatigues, warned people that a revolution was coming and memorized the speeches of Malcolm X. "I now believed that the whole of American culture was irretrievably tainted by racism, " he once said, describing his reaction to the assassination of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. On Tuesday, that same man helped dismantle a key provision of the Voting Rights Act, one of the pillars of the civil rights movement. If he had his way, he would bury another pillar: affirmative action. There may seem to be a contradiction between the Clarence Thomas who was the angry campus radical in the 1960s and the conservative hero who sits on the U. S. Supreme Court today. But some legal observers say Thomas sees himself as a "prophetic civil rights leader" who is still fighting for the same cause -- a colorblind America. "A lot of people who are what I call professional Negros have ridden white guilt and socialism to very lucrative lives, " says Holzer, who uses the term "Negro" because he says he doesn't classify people by skin color. "Thomas didn't, " Holzer says. "He made a very deliberate and gutsy decision to go where his intellect and his study took him, and that's heroic. " One man's hero, though, is another man's sellout. During his nearly 22 years on the nation's highest court, Thomas has been called a self-loathing "Uncle Thomas. " His impact, though, cannot be ignored. His judicial opinions have transformed America. And no other contemporary Supreme Court justice has spoken with such raw emotion about race or has embodied the subject's complexities. Yet he is still a mystery to many. There are questions about Thomas that have persisted even after two decades on the Supreme Court as its lone African-American justice. Here are three of them: Question 1: Why does Thomas condemn affirmative action if he benefited from it? On Monday, the Supreme Court sidestepped a sweeping decisio n on the use of race in college admissions, throwing a Texas case back to the lower courts for further review. The high court had been asked to decide if the University of Texas violated the constitutional rights of some white applicants by considering race in the admissions process. Thomas, in issuing a concurring opinion with the 7-1 majority, left no doubt as to how he would have ruled had the court not found that lower federal courts failed to apply the appropriate standards in the Texas case. "Just as the alleged educational benefits of segregation were insufficient to justify racial discrimination then, " Thomas wrote, "the alleged educational benefits of diversity cannot justify racial discrimination today. " "The university's professed good intentions cannot excuse its outright racial discrimination any more than such intentions justified the now denounced arguments of slaveholders and segregationists. " Thomas has consistently voted against affirmative action policies because he says they're divisive, unconstitutional and harmful to their recipients. He cites his own experience as an example. Thomas was born in poverty in rural Georgia but managed to gain admittance to Yale Law School. He acknowledges that he made it to Yale because of affirmative action but says the stigma of preferential treatment made it difficult for him to find a job after college. In his memoir, "My Grandfather's Son, " Thomas says he felt "tricked" by paternalistic whites at Yale who recruited black students. "I was bitter toward the white bigots whom I held responsible for the unjust treatment of blacks, " he wrote, "but even more bitter toward those ostensibly unprejudiced whites who pretended to side with black people while using them to further their own political and social ends. " Some observers, though, counter with one question: If affirmative action is so bad for its recipients, how come you've done so well? "His entire judicial philosophy is at war with his own biography, " said Michael Fletcher, co-author of "Supreme Discomfort: The Divided Soul of Clarence Thomas. " "He's arguably benefited from affirmative action every step of the way. " For many blacks, affirmative action is "the contemporary equivalent of the Emancipation Proclamation, " Fletcher explains in his book. It's one of the most important legacies of the civil rights movement. The expansion of the black middle class was driven by affirmative action policies, he says. Some blacks detest Thomas not because he's conservative, Fletcher says, but because he rules against affirmative action policies, closing the door that was opened for him. The black community has accepted conservatives as varied as Booker T. Washington, Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice. Many members of the community dislike Thomas for another reason. "Some say he's a traitor and hypocritical, " says Fletcher, an economics correspondent with The Washington Post. Thomas first attracted public attention in the early 1980s when President Ronald Reagan asked him to lead the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which enforces federal discrimination laws. Thomas' opposition to affirmative action and criticisms of civil rights leaders during his tenure made headlines. In 1990, President George H. W. Bush appointed Thomas to the powerful U. Court of Appeals for the D. C. Circuit, a traditional steppingstone to the Supreme Court. Would Thomas have risen so far so quickly had he not been black? CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin doesn't think so. In a biting 2007 New Yorker magazine review of Thomas' memoir, Toobin wrote that Thomas had never tried a case or argued an appeal in any federal court and had never produced any scholarly work when he made the D. appeals court. "Yale and Reagan treated him the same way, but he hates one and reveres the other, " Toobin wrote. "Thomas never acknowledges, much less explains, the contradiction. " When Bush selected Thomas in 1991 to replace Thurgood Marshall, the court's first black justice, the questions about Thomas' qualifications intensified. Bush said he picked "the best qualified" nominee, but Thomas questioned that in his memoir, saying even he had doubts about Bush's "extravagant" claim. "There was no way I could really know what the president and his aides had been thinking when they picked me, " he wrote. Thomas' defenders say his performance on the high court has removed any doubts about his qualifications. They call him the most consistent conservative on the court, a man who won't sacrifice his principles to eke out a short-term judicial victory. Holzer, author of "The Supreme Court Opinions of Clarence Thomas, " says he doesn't think Thomas "benefited from affirmative action at all. " Thomas' legal acumen is well-known, says Holzer, a retired law professor from Brooklyn Law School. Thomas is the court's leading "originalist" -- he says he interprets the Constitution based on what the framers meant, not on any partisan policy preferences. "This may be hard for Toobin to swallow -- Clarence Thomas would have been appointed were he white, yellow, brown, beige, even blue or green. " Scott Douglas Gerber, an Ohio Northern University law professor and author of "First Principles: The Jurisprudence of Clarence Thomas, " says Thomas is on the verge of cementing his judicial legacy with the civil rights cases before the court. Thomas' constitutional philosophy is simple, Gerber says: All Americans should be treated as individuals and not as members of a racial or ethnic group. Gerber says Thomas has ruled against the Voting Rights Act in the past because he believes that laws based on the "proportional allocation of political powers according to race" should be overturned. The Voting Rights Act is considered one of the crown jewels of the civil rights movement. Its passage, which came about after King led a dramatic campaign in Selma, Alabama, is responsible for the expansion of black political power in the last 30 years. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court's conservative majority issued a ruling that essentially strikes at the heart of the Voting Rights Act. The court voted 5-4 to limit the use of a key provision in the landmark law, in effect invalidating federal enforcement over all or parts of 15 states with a past history of voter discrimination. Thomas isn't the only Supreme Court justice whose life has been shaped by affirmative action. One of his colleagues is grateful for the role it played in her life. Sonia Sotomayor told "60 Minutes" that affirmative action helped her gain admittance to Princeton University. (She also graduated from Yale Law School. ) She is the first Hispanic justice on the Supreme Court. "It was a door-opener that changed the course of my life, " Sotomayor said in the January interview. Question 2: How does Thomas embr
Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words printable. And here we are 27 years politics, different faces... horrific. * its disgusting that he using the black card to justify his actions as if we dont have enough on our plates with foul play in system. Hes a pathological liar and predator. Free Online Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own words. Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words images.
Accueil > Films > 2020 > Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words En bref Bandes-annonces Casting Sortie Inconnu Mis à jour le 8 février 2020 Avec Clarence Thomas Durée 1h 56min Genre Documentaire Réalisé par Michael Pack Langue anglais Noter ce film 1. Déjà vu ce film? 0 2. Partagez votre opinion, écrivez votre critique Publier en tant qu'invité Synopsis et détails Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words est un film (1h 56min) de Michael Pack avec Clarence Thomas. Découvrez 1 Bandes-annonces et le casting de 1 stars sur CinéSéries Titre original Box Office - Année de Production 2020 Budget Production Manifold Productions.
Free Online Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own words to say. Go Big Red. Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words meaning. Free Online Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own words to eat. YouTube.
¢§¢§¢§¢§¢§¢§¢§¢§¢§¢§
STREAM; WATCH
??????????
Creator: Michael Pack. Directed by: Michael Pack. actor: Ginni Thomas. &ref(https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMjVlNWUwZmUtOTg1MC00ZWZmLWE3YzAtN2QzMzgwNDZjZTM3XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMjI5Nzc3NjE@._V1_UY113_CR0,0,76,113_AL_.jpg). User rating: 8,5 / 10 Stars. USA. Same southern democrats who fought a civil war to keep slavery legal still don't like it when a black man breaks free from their plantation. They'll give you food and shelter and all they demand in return is your heart, mind, and soul. Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words free.
¦§ ¦Ê¦Á¦Ñ¦Éέ¦Ñ¦Á ¦Ó¦Ï¦Ô Clarence Thomas ¦Ò¦Ó¦Ç ¦Ä¦É¦Ê¦Ç¦Ã¦Ï¦Ñί¦Á ¦Ê¦Á¦É ¦Ó¦Ç ¦Ð¦Ï¦Ë¦É¦Ó¦É¦Êή. Έ¦Í¦Á ¦Íέ¦Ï ¦Í¦Ó¦Ï¦Ê¦É¦Ì¦Á¦Í¦Óέ¦Ñ έ¦Ñ¦Ö¦Å¦Ó¦Á¦É ¦Ì¦Å ¦Ó¦Ï Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words. ¦³¦Ï ¦Å¦Ðί¦Ò¦Ç¦Ì¦Ï ¦Í¦Ó¦Ï¦Ê¦É¦Ì¦Á¦Í¦Óέ¦Ñ ¦Ê¦Ô¦Ê¦Ë¦Ï¦Õό¦Ñ¦Ç¦Ò¦Å. ¦¤¦Åί¦Ó¦Å ¦Ó¦Ï. ¦¤¦É¦Á¦Âά¦Ò¦Ó¦Å ¦Å¦Ðί¦Ò¦Çς ¦¥¦Ð¦É¦Êί¦Í¦Ä¦Ô¦Í¦Á stunts ¦Ò¦Ó¦Ï ?Elba Vs. Block? ¦°¦Ï¦É¦Ïς ¦Åί¦Í¦Á¦É ¦Ï ¦Ê¦Á¦Ëύ¦Ó¦Å¦Ñ¦Ïς ¦Ðί¦Ò¦Ø ¦Á¦Ð¡Ç¦Ó¦Ï ¦Ó¦É¦Ìό¦Í¦É; ¦¡¦Ô¦Óό ¦Á¦Í¦Á¦Ñ¦Ø¦Ó¦Éέ¦Ó¦Á¦É ¦Ó¦Ï Elba Vs. Block ¦Ð¦Ï¦Ô ¦Ó¦Ï¦Ôς ¦Âά¦Æ¦Å¦É ¦Ò¦Å ¦Á¦Í¦Ó¦Á¦Ã¦Ø¦Í¦É¦Ò¦Ìό. ¦³¦Ï ¦Ð¦Ñώ¦Ó¦Ï teaser ¦Ê¦Ô¦Ê¦Ë¦Ï¦Õό¦Ñ¦Ç¦Ò¦Å. ¦¤¦Åί¦Ó¦Å ¦Ó¦Ï. I can't believe she was offended by the pubic hair in my coke thing. My wife thought it was hilarious. Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words movie. Story highlights High court's lone African-American justice ruled against civil rights pillar Conservative majority's decision strikes at heart of 1965 Voting Rights Act Questions about Clarence Thomas persist even after two decades on the Supreme Court Among them: Why does he condemn affirmative action if he benefited from it? He wore a black beret and Army fatigues, warned people that a revolution was coming and memorized the speeches of Malcolm X. "I now believed that the whole of American culture was irretrievably tainted by racism, " he once said, describing his reaction to the assassination of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. On Tuesday, that same man helped dismantle a key provision of the Voting Rights Act, one of the pillars of the civil rights movement. If he had his way, he would bury another pillar: affirmative action. There may seem to be a contradiction between the Clarence Thomas who was the angry campus radical in the 1960s and the conservative hero who sits on the U. S. Supreme Court today. But some legal observers say Thomas sees himself as a "prophetic civil rights leader" who is still fighting for the same cause -- a colorblind America. "A lot of people who are what I call professional Negros have ridden white guilt and socialism to very lucrative lives, " says Holzer, who uses the term "Negro" because he says he doesn't classify people by skin color. "Thomas didn't, " Holzer says. "He made a very deliberate and gutsy decision to go where his intellect and his study took him, and that's heroic. " One man's hero, though, is another man's sellout. During his nearly 22 years on the nation's highest court, Thomas has been called a self-loathing "Uncle Thomas. " His impact, though, cannot be ignored. His judicial opinions have transformed America. And no other contemporary Supreme Court justice has spoken with such raw emotion about race or has embodied the subject's complexities. Yet he is still a mystery to many. There are questions about Thomas that have persisted even after two decades on the Supreme Court as its lone African-American justice. Here are three of them: Question 1: Why does Thomas condemn affirmative action if he benefited from it? On Monday, the Supreme Court sidestepped a sweeping decisio n on the use of race in college admissions, throwing a Texas case back to the lower courts for further review. The high court had been asked to decide if the University of Texas violated the constitutional rights of some white applicants by considering race in the admissions process. Thomas, in issuing a concurring opinion with the 7-1 majority, left no doubt as to how he would have ruled had the court not found that lower federal courts failed to apply the appropriate standards in the Texas case. "Just as the alleged educational benefits of segregation were insufficient to justify racial discrimination then, " Thomas wrote, "the alleged educational benefits of diversity cannot justify racial discrimination today. " "The university's professed good intentions cannot excuse its outright racial discrimination any more than such intentions justified the now denounced arguments of slaveholders and segregationists. " Thomas has consistently voted against affirmative action policies because he says they're divisive, unconstitutional and harmful to their recipients. He cites his own experience as an example. Thomas was born in poverty in rural Georgia but managed to gain admittance to Yale Law School. He acknowledges that he made it to Yale because of affirmative action but says the stigma of preferential treatment made it difficult for him to find a job after college. In his memoir, "My Grandfather's Son, " Thomas says he felt "tricked" by paternalistic whites at Yale who recruited black students. "I was bitter toward the white bigots whom I held responsible for the unjust treatment of blacks, " he wrote, "but even more bitter toward those ostensibly unprejudiced whites who pretended to side with black people while using them to further their own political and social ends. " Some observers, though, counter with one question: If affirmative action is so bad for its recipients, how come you've done so well? "His entire judicial philosophy is at war with his own biography, " said Michael Fletcher, co-author of "Supreme Discomfort: The Divided Soul of Clarence Thomas. " "He's arguably benefited from affirmative action every step of the way. " For many blacks, affirmative action is "the contemporary equivalent of the Emancipation Proclamation, " Fletcher explains in his book. It's one of the most important legacies of the civil rights movement. The expansion of the black middle class was driven by affirmative action policies, he says. Some blacks detest Thomas not because he's conservative, Fletcher says, but because he rules against affirmative action policies, closing the door that was opened for him. The black community has accepted conservatives as varied as Booker T. Washington, Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice. Many members of the community dislike Thomas for another reason. "Some say he's a traitor and hypocritical, " says Fletcher, an economics correspondent with The Washington Post. Thomas first attracted public attention in the early 1980s when President Ronald Reagan asked him to lead the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which enforces federal discrimination laws. Thomas' opposition to affirmative action and criticisms of civil rights leaders during his tenure made headlines. In 1990, President George H. W. Bush appointed Thomas to the powerful U. Court of Appeals for the D. C. Circuit, a traditional steppingstone to the Supreme Court. Would Thomas have risen so far so quickly had he not been black? CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin doesn't think so. In a biting 2007 New Yorker magazine review of Thomas' memoir, Toobin wrote that Thomas had never tried a case or argued an appeal in any federal court and had never produced any scholarly work when he made the D. appeals court. "Yale and Reagan treated him the same way, but he hates one and reveres the other, " Toobin wrote. "Thomas never acknowledges, much less explains, the contradiction. " When Bush selected Thomas in 1991 to replace Thurgood Marshall, the court's first black justice, the questions about Thomas' qualifications intensified. Bush said he picked "the best qualified" nominee, but Thomas questioned that in his memoir, saying even he had doubts about Bush's "extravagant" claim. "There was no way I could really know what the president and his aides had been thinking when they picked me, " he wrote. Thomas' defenders say his performance on the high court has removed any doubts about his qualifications. They call him the most consistent conservative on the court, a man who won't sacrifice his principles to eke out a short-term judicial victory. Holzer, author of "The Supreme Court Opinions of Clarence Thomas, " says he doesn't think Thomas "benefited from affirmative action at all. " Thomas' legal acumen is well-known, says Holzer, a retired law professor from Brooklyn Law School. Thomas is the court's leading "originalist" -- he says he interprets the Constitution based on what the framers meant, not on any partisan policy preferences. "This may be hard for Toobin to swallow -- Clarence Thomas would have been appointed were he white, yellow, brown, beige, even blue or green. " Scott Douglas Gerber, an Ohio Northern University law professor and author of "First Principles: The Jurisprudence of Clarence Thomas, " says Thomas is on the verge of cementing his judicial legacy with the civil rights cases before the court. Thomas' constitutional philosophy is simple, Gerber says: All Americans should be treated as individuals and not as members of a racial or ethnic group. Gerber says Thomas has ruled against the Voting Rights Act in the past because he believes that laws based on the "proportional allocation of political powers according to race" should be overturned. The Voting Rights Act is considered one of the crown jewels of the civil rights movement. Its passage, which came about after King led a dramatic campaign in Selma, Alabama, is responsible for the expansion of black political power in the last 30 years. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court's conservative majority issued a ruling that essentially strikes at the heart of the Voting Rights Act. The court voted 5-4 to limit the use of a key provision in the landmark law, in effect invalidating federal enforcement over all or parts of 15 states with a past history of voter discrimination. Thomas isn't the only Supreme Court justice whose life has been shaped by affirmative action. One of his colleagues is grateful for the role it played in her life. Sonia Sotomayor told "60 Minutes" that affirmative action helped her gain admittance to Princeton University. (She also graduated from Yale Law School. ) She is the first Hispanic justice on the Supreme Court. "It was a door-opener that changed the course of my life, " Sotomayor said in the January interview. Question 2: How does Thomas embr
Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words printable. And here we are 27 years politics, different faces... horrific. * its disgusting that he using the black card to justify his actions as if we dont have enough on our plates with foul play in system. Hes a pathological liar and predator. Free Online Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own words. Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words images.
Accueil > Films > 2020 > Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words En bref Bandes-annonces Casting Sortie Inconnu Mis à jour le 8 février 2020 Avec Clarence Thomas Durée 1h 56min Genre Documentaire Réalisé par Michael Pack Langue anglais Noter ce film 1. Déjà vu ce film? 0 2. Partagez votre opinion, écrivez votre critique Publier en tant qu'invité Synopsis et détails Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words est un film (1h 56min) de Michael Pack avec Clarence Thomas. Découvrez 1 Bandes-annonces et le casting de 1 stars sur CinéSéries Titre original Box Office - Année de Production 2020 Budget Production Manifold Productions.
Free Online Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own words to say. Go Big Red. Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words meaning. Free Online Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own words to eat. YouTube.
Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words full. Free Online Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own words of love. Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words first. Free Online Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own words without. Wow a compelling movie makes you really think. The Republicans have so much to thank Justice Clarence Thomas for the confirmation of Judge Kavanaugh because they learned from the precedent of Thomas' confirmation experience.
As many of us know now, the threat of women in positions of clerical power would reveal the abuses that male priests have inflicted upon their young female & young male congregations children, revealing the threat of exposure to child abuse that is rampant in the Catholic Church. This movie made it clear to me how the abuse of power was a very political & criminal attempt at covering up that sexual abuse. Wow. Joining the dots is heartbreaking, however, necessary for our sanity in a godless world of infidels! God Bless us All who dare to expose these horrific truths. ??????.
Free Online Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own words on the page. Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words list. Its eye opening to realize that Democrats were just as much the scumbag party back then as they are today. I love him and pray for him, a true giant of our time, his impact on the country is hugely positive and will be recognized in due time.
Free Online Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own words and pictures. Clarence Thomas reminds me of Clayton Bigsby on the Dave Chappelle Show. Free Online Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own wordsmith. Just plain beautifully spoken. Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words video. Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words worksheet. | Posted: Nov 16, 2019 12:01 AM The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of There¡Çs a moment in the new Clarence Thomas documentary, ¡ÈCreated Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words, ¡É following the harrowing confirmation hearing that saw the gentle man, loving husband, and legal genius from Pin Point, Ga., accused of sexual harassment and smeared as a lecherous monster, that sticks with you long after the 2-hour film ends. It¡Çs the look Thomas has on his face at his swearing-in ceremony. He¡Çs not elated by the prospect of joining the Supreme Court. He looks tired and maybe more than a little concerned for his safety. And it¡Çs an indictment of the people ?? one of the most prominent in the person of then-Senator Joe Biden who came across as something of a grand inquisitor ? who put Thomas through what he called at the time a ¡Èhigh-tech lynching for uppity blacks. ¡É "This is a circus. It is a national disgrace. And from my standpoint, as a black American, as far as I am concerned, it is a high-tech lynching for uppity-blacks who in any way deign to think for themselves, to do for themselves, to have different ideas, and it is a message that, unless you kow-tow to an old order, this is what will happen to you, you will be lynched, destroyed, caricatured by a committee of the U. S. Senate, rather than hung from a tree. " Filmmaker Michael Pack conducted hundreds of hours of interviews with Thomas and his wife Virginia to create this stunning documentary, which will see a wide release in May 2020 on PBS. And while it covers Thomas¡Ç impoverished upbringing in Pin Point and later Savannah, Ga., as well as his college days as a left-wing angry social justice revolutionary, it is most moving when it covers those days of the Anita Hill allegations when Thomas¡Ç opportunity to sit on the highest court in the land was very nearly stripped from him by allegations he still unequivocally denies. In his 2008 memoir, ¡ÈMy Grandfather¡Çs Son¡É ? a grandfather that is a looming presence over the film and, indeed, everything Thomas does ? the Justice known for his quiet analysis (which he says is part of judicial philosophy that rejects the idea of judicial activism) recounts that by the end of the confirmation hearing he no longer cared about being a Supreme Court Justice. He cared only about fighting back. "I didn¡Çt care whether I ever sat on the Supreme Court, but I wasn¡Çt going to let what little my family and I had cobbled together to be so wantonly smashed. My enemies wanted nothing more than for me to go quietly. I, on the other hand, owed it to my family and the memory of my grandparents and forebears not to self-destruct but to confront them with the truth. " It¡Çs a sentiment now Supreme Court Justice Bret Kavanaugh repeated at his own hearing where, he, too, was confronted with what were surely drummed up charges of sexual impropriety intended to smear him and ruin his life. ¡ÈYou may defeat me in the final vote, but you¡Çll never get me to quit, ever, ¡É Kavanaugh said. Which is to say the Democrats¡Ç dirty tricks haven¡Çt changed in 30 years.? And the real shame of it all is that, as ¡ÈCreated Equal¡É showcases, Thomas had been through more than most in order to overcome his challenges to find himself on the threshold of a SCOTUS seat. He should have been rejoicing in his achievement. Instead, as he told Pack in the film, he feels now about being on the Court exactly the same as he did when he was confirmed. ¡ÈWhoop-dee-doo, ¡É Thomas says in the film, without a hint of a smile behind his eyes. Perhaps the ability to remain unaffected by the glamor of the position makes Thomas a better Justice. It likely does. It almost certainly keeps his attention on the cases at hand and on his own interpretation of them as a constitutional ¡Èoriginalist. ¡É But it¡Çs a little heartbreaking that this is what the politics of personal destruction, led by liberals and progressives, do to the good men of this country. Fortunately, there¡Çs much more to Thomas¡Ç story, happier anecdotes about meeting his wife and making his grandfather proud, that shine through in Pack¡Çs film.? But that look on his face at his swearing-in ceremony stays with you long after the film ends. Sarah Lee is a freelance writer and policy wonk living and working in Washington, DC.
View photos Click here to read the full article. If you watch ¡ÈCreated Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words¡É looking for a clue as to Thomas¡Ç inner workings, a key to who Clarence Thomas really is, then you¡Çll have to wait a while before it arrives. But it does. The reason it takes so long is that Thomas, dressed in a red tie, light shirt, and blue jacket (yes, his entire outfit is color-coordinated to the American flag), his graying head looking impressive and nearly statue-ready as he gazes into the camera, presents himself as a regular guy, affably growly and folksy in a casual straight-shooter way. And while I have no doubt that¡Çs an honest aspect of who he is, it¡Çs also a shrewdly orchestrated tactic, a way of saying: Don¡Çt try to look for my demons ? you won¡Çt find them. The revealing moment comes when Thomas recalls the 1991 Senate hearings in which he was grilled on national television as part of the Supreme Court confirmation process. Does he go back and talk about Anita Hill? Yes, he does (I¡Çll get to that shortly), but?that isn¡Çt the revealing part. Discussing Anita Hill, Thomas reveals next to nothing. His métier now is exactly what it was then: Deny, deny, deny. More from Variety Film News Roundup: Clarence Thomas Documentary to Get Theatrical Release Anita Hill's Commission Launches Entertainment Industry Survey on Sexual Harassment Katy Perry and Anita Hill Honored at the DVF Awards Thomas tips his hand, though, when he recalls the moment that a senator asked if he¡Çd ever had a private conversation about Roe v. Wade. At the time, he said no ? and now, 30 years later, that ¡Èno¡É has just gotten louder. In hindsight, he¡Çs incredulous that anyone would simply presume that he¡Çd ever had a private discussion about Roe v. He¡Çs almost proud of how wrong they were to think so. In a Senate hearing, when you say that you¡Çve never had that kind of conversation, it¡Çs in all likelihood political ? a way, in this case, of keeping your beliefs about abortion ambiguous and close to the vest. A way of keeping them officially off the table. In ¡ÈCreated Equal, ¡É however, Thomas is being sincere. He has always maintained that he finds it insulting ? and racist ? that people would expect an African-American citizen like himself to conform to a prescribed liberal ideology. And in the same vein, he thinks it¡Çs ridiculous that a Senate questioner expected him to say that he¡Çd ever spent two minutes sitting around talking about Roe v. But talk about an argument that backfires! I¡Çm not a federal judge (and the last time I checked, I¡Çve never tried to become a Supreme Court justice), but I¡Çve had many conversations in my life about Roe v. Why wouldn¡Çt I? I¡Çm an ordinary politically inclined American. I mean, how could you not talk about it ? ever? Abortion rights, no matter where you happen to stand on them, are a defining issue of our world. And the fact that Clarence Thomas was up for the role of Supreme Court justice, and that he still views it as A-okay to say that he¡Çd never had a single discussion about Roe v. Wade, shows you where he¡Çs coming from. He has opinions and convictions. But he is, in a word, incurious. He¡Çs a go-along-to-get-along kind of guy, a man who worked hard and achieved something and enjoyed a steady rise without ever being driven to explore things. He was a bureaucrat. Which is fine; plenty of people are. But not the people we expect to be on the Supreme Court. ¡ÈCreated Equal¡É is structured as a monologue of self-justification, a two-hour infomercial for the decency, the competence, and the conservative role-model aspirationalism of Clarence Thomas. Since he followed the 1991 Senate hearings, even in victory, by going off and licking his wounds, maintaining a public persona that was studiously recessive, there¡Çs a certain interest in ¡Èhanging out¡É with Thomas and taking in his cultivated self-presentation. The movie, in its public-relations heart, is right-wing boilerplate (though it¡Çs mild next to the all-in-for-Trump documentary screeds of Dinesh D¡ÇSouza), and there are worse ways to get to know someone like Thomas than to watch him deliver what is basically the visual version of an I-did-it-my-way audiobook memoir, with lots of news clips and photographs to illustrate his words. The first half of the movie draws you in, because it¡Çs basically the story of how Thomas, born in 1948 in the rural community of Pin Point, Georgia, was raised in a penniless family who spoke the creole language of Gullah, and of how he pulled himself up by his bootstraps. After a fire left the family homeless, he and his brother went off to Savannah to live with their grandfather, an illiterate but sternly disciplined taskmaster who gave Thomas his backbone of self-reliance. He entered Conception Seminary College when he was 16, and he loved it ? but in a story Thomas has often told, he left the seminary after the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. when he overheard a fellow student make an ugly remark about King. That¡Çs a telling anecdote, but there¡Çs a reason Thomas showcases it the way he does. It¡Çs his one official grand statement of racial outrage. In ¡ÈCreated Equal, ¡É he talks for two hours but says next to nothing about his feelings on the Civil Rights movement, or on what it was like to be raised in the Jim Crow South. As a student at Holy Cross, the Jesuit liberal arts college near Boston, he joined a crew of black ¡Èrevolutionaries¡É and dressed the part in Army fatigues, but he now mocks that stage of his development, cutting right to his conservative awakening, which coalesced around the issue of busing. Thomas thought it was nuts to bus black kids from Roxbury to schools in South Boston that were every bit as bad as the ones they were already attending. And maybe he was right. Thomas, using busing and welfare as his example, decries the liberal dream as a series of idealistic engineering projects that human beings were then wedged into. There may be aspects of truth to that critique, but liberalism was also rolling up its sleeves to grapple with the agony of injustice. The philosophy that Thomas evolved had a connect-the-dots perfection to it: Treat everyone equal! Period! How easy! It certainly sounds good on paper, yet you want to ask: Couldn¡Çt one use the same logic that rejects affirmative action programs to reject anti-discrimination law? Thomas projects out from his own example: He came from nothing and made something of himself, so why can¡Çt everyone else? But he never stops to consider that he was, in fact, an unusually gifted man. His aw-shucks manner makes him likably unpretentious, but where¡Çs his empathy for all the people who weren¡Çt as talented or lucky? In ¡ÈCreated Equal, ¡É Thomas continues to treat Anita Hill¡Çs testimony against him as part of a liberal smear campaign ? and, therefore, as a lie. He compares himself to Tom Robinson, the railroaded black man in ¡ÈTo Kill a Mockingbird, ¡É viewing himself as a pure victim. Thomas¡Ç wife, Virginia Lamp, who sat by his side at the hearings (and is interviewed in the film), stands by him today. But more than two years into the #MeToo revolution, the meaning of the Clarence Thomas/Anita Hill Senate testimony stands clearer than ever. It was the first time in America that a public accusation of sexual harassment shook the earth. The meaning of those hearings transcends the fight over whether one more conservative justice got to be added to the Supreme Court. Thomas now admits that he refused to withdraw his nomination less out of a desire to serve on the Supreme Court than because caving in would have been death to him. ¡ÈI¡Çve never cried uncle, ¡É he says, ¡Èwhether I wanted to be on the Supreme Court or not. ¡É It¡Çs an honest confession, but a little like the Roe v. Wade thing: Where was his intellectual and moral desire to serve on the court? By then, he¡Çd been a federal judge for just 16 months, and he admits that he wasn¡Çt drawn to that job either; but he found that he liked the work. Thomas also explains why, once he had ascended to the high court, he went through a period where, famously, he didn¡Çt ask a single question at a public hearing for more than 10 years. His rationalization (¡ÈThe referee in the game should not be a participant in the game¡É) is, more or less, nonsense. But his silence spoke volumes. It was his passive-aggressive way of turning inward, of treating an appointment he didn¡Çt truly want with anger ? of coasting as a form of rebellion. It was his way of pretending to be his own man, even as he continued to play the hallowed conservative role of good soldier. Best of Variety The Best Albums of the Decade Sign up for Variety¡Çs Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. View photos.
&ref(https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1571603957065-a7d7cbf4cbdf?ixlib=rb-1.2.1) Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words pictures. Clarence Thomas can't wait for another Sexual Creep to join him on the SCOTUS. Sexual Creeps of the United States #SCOTUS. Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words online.
As many of us know now, the threat of women in positions of clerical power would reveal the abuses that male priests have inflicted upon their young female & young male congregations children, revealing the threat of exposure to child abuse that is rampant in the Catholic Church. This movie made it clear to me how the abuse of power was a very political & criminal attempt at covering up that sexual abuse. Wow. Joining the dots is heartbreaking, however, necessary for our sanity in a godless world of infidels! God Bless us All who dare to expose these horrific truths. ??????.
Free Online Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own words on the page. Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words list. Its eye opening to realize that Democrats were just as much the scumbag party back then as they are today. I love him and pray for him, a true giant of our time, his impact on the country is hugely positive and will be recognized in due time.
Free Online Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own words and pictures. Clarence Thomas reminds me of Clayton Bigsby on the Dave Chappelle Show. Free Online Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own wordsmith. Just plain beautifully spoken. Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words video. Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words worksheet. | Posted: Nov 16, 2019 12:01 AM The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of There¡Çs a moment in the new Clarence Thomas documentary, ¡ÈCreated Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words, ¡É following the harrowing confirmation hearing that saw the gentle man, loving husband, and legal genius from Pin Point, Ga., accused of sexual harassment and smeared as a lecherous monster, that sticks with you long after the 2-hour film ends. It¡Çs the look Thomas has on his face at his swearing-in ceremony. He¡Çs not elated by the prospect of joining the Supreme Court. He looks tired and maybe more than a little concerned for his safety. And it¡Çs an indictment of the people ?? one of the most prominent in the person of then-Senator Joe Biden who came across as something of a grand inquisitor ? who put Thomas through what he called at the time a ¡Èhigh-tech lynching for uppity blacks. ¡É "This is a circus. It is a national disgrace. And from my standpoint, as a black American, as far as I am concerned, it is a high-tech lynching for uppity-blacks who in any way deign to think for themselves, to do for themselves, to have different ideas, and it is a message that, unless you kow-tow to an old order, this is what will happen to you, you will be lynched, destroyed, caricatured by a committee of the U. S. Senate, rather than hung from a tree. " Filmmaker Michael Pack conducted hundreds of hours of interviews with Thomas and his wife Virginia to create this stunning documentary, which will see a wide release in May 2020 on PBS. And while it covers Thomas¡Ç impoverished upbringing in Pin Point and later Savannah, Ga., as well as his college days as a left-wing angry social justice revolutionary, it is most moving when it covers those days of the Anita Hill allegations when Thomas¡Ç opportunity to sit on the highest court in the land was very nearly stripped from him by allegations he still unequivocally denies. In his 2008 memoir, ¡ÈMy Grandfather¡Çs Son¡É ? a grandfather that is a looming presence over the film and, indeed, everything Thomas does ? the Justice known for his quiet analysis (which he says is part of judicial philosophy that rejects the idea of judicial activism) recounts that by the end of the confirmation hearing he no longer cared about being a Supreme Court Justice. He cared only about fighting back. "I didn¡Çt care whether I ever sat on the Supreme Court, but I wasn¡Çt going to let what little my family and I had cobbled together to be so wantonly smashed. My enemies wanted nothing more than for me to go quietly. I, on the other hand, owed it to my family and the memory of my grandparents and forebears not to self-destruct but to confront them with the truth. " It¡Çs a sentiment now Supreme Court Justice Bret Kavanaugh repeated at his own hearing where, he, too, was confronted with what were surely drummed up charges of sexual impropriety intended to smear him and ruin his life. ¡ÈYou may defeat me in the final vote, but you¡Çll never get me to quit, ever, ¡É Kavanaugh said. Which is to say the Democrats¡Ç dirty tricks haven¡Çt changed in 30 years.? And the real shame of it all is that, as ¡ÈCreated Equal¡É showcases, Thomas had been through more than most in order to overcome his challenges to find himself on the threshold of a SCOTUS seat. He should have been rejoicing in his achievement. Instead, as he told Pack in the film, he feels now about being on the Court exactly the same as he did when he was confirmed. ¡ÈWhoop-dee-doo, ¡É Thomas says in the film, without a hint of a smile behind his eyes. Perhaps the ability to remain unaffected by the glamor of the position makes Thomas a better Justice. It likely does. It almost certainly keeps his attention on the cases at hand and on his own interpretation of them as a constitutional ¡Èoriginalist. ¡É But it¡Çs a little heartbreaking that this is what the politics of personal destruction, led by liberals and progressives, do to the good men of this country. Fortunately, there¡Çs much more to Thomas¡Ç story, happier anecdotes about meeting his wife and making his grandfather proud, that shine through in Pack¡Çs film.? But that look on his face at his swearing-in ceremony stays with you long after the film ends. Sarah Lee is a freelance writer and policy wonk living and working in Washington, DC.
View photos Click here to read the full article. If you watch ¡ÈCreated Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words¡É looking for a clue as to Thomas¡Ç inner workings, a key to who Clarence Thomas really is, then you¡Çll have to wait a while before it arrives. But it does. The reason it takes so long is that Thomas, dressed in a red tie, light shirt, and blue jacket (yes, his entire outfit is color-coordinated to the American flag), his graying head looking impressive and nearly statue-ready as he gazes into the camera, presents himself as a regular guy, affably growly and folksy in a casual straight-shooter way. And while I have no doubt that¡Çs an honest aspect of who he is, it¡Çs also a shrewdly orchestrated tactic, a way of saying: Don¡Çt try to look for my demons ? you won¡Çt find them. The revealing moment comes when Thomas recalls the 1991 Senate hearings in which he was grilled on national television as part of the Supreme Court confirmation process. Does he go back and talk about Anita Hill? Yes, he does (I¡Çll get to that shortly), but?that isn¡Çt the revealing part. Discussing Anita Hill, Thomas reveals next to nothing. His métier now is exactly what it was then: Deny, deny, deny. More from Variety Film News Roundup: Clarence Thomas Documentary to Get Theatrical Release Anita Hill's Commission Launches Entertainment Industry Survey on Sexual Harassment Katy Perry and Anita Hill Honored at the DVF Awards Thomas tips his hand, though, when he recalls the moment that a senator asked if he¡Çd ever had a private conversation about Roe v. Wade. At the time, he said no ? and now, 30 years later, that ¡Èno¡É has just gotten louder. In hindsight, he¡Çs incredulous that anyone would simply presume that he¡Çd ever had a private discussion about Roe v. He¡Çs almost proud of how wrong they were to think so. In a Senate hearing, when you say that you¡Çve never had that kind of conversation, it¡Çs in all likelihood political ? a way, in this case, of keeping your beliefs about abortion ambiguous and close to the vest. A way of keeping them officially off the table. In ¡ÈCreated Equal, ¡É however, Thomas is being sincere. He has always maintained that he finds it insulting ? and racist ? that people would expect an African-American citizen like himself to conform to a prescribed liberal ideology. And in the same vein, he thinks it¡Çs ridiculous that a Senate questioner expected him to say that he¡Çd ever spent two minutes sitting around talking about Roe v. But talk about an argument that backfires! I¡Çm not a federal judge (and the last time I checked, I¡Çve never tried to become a Supreme Court justice), but I¡Çve had many conversations in my life about Roe v. Why wouldn¡Çt I? I¡Çm an ordinary politically inclined American. I mean, how could you not talk about it ? ever? Abortion rights, no matter where you happen to stand on them, are a defining issue of our world. And the fact that Clarence Thomas was up for the role of Supreme Court justice, and that he still views it as A-okay to say that he¡Çd never had a single discussion about Roe v. Wade, shows you where he¡Çs coming from. He has opinions and convictions. But he is, in a word, incurious. He¡Çs a go-along-to-get-along kind of guy, a man who worked hard and achieved something and enjoyed a steady rise without ever being driven to explore things. He was a bureaucrat. Which is fine; plenty of people are. But not the people we expect to be on the Supreme Court. ¡ÈCreated Equal¡É is structured as a monologue of self-justification, a two-hour infomercial for the decency, the competence, and the conservative role-model aspirationalism of Clarence Thomas. Since he followed the 1991 Senate hearings, even in victory, by going off and licking his wounds, maintaining a public persona that was studiously recessive, there¡Çs a certain interest in ¡Èhanging out¡É with Thomas and taking in his cultivated self-presentation. The movie, in its public-relations heart, is right-wing boilerplate (though it¡Çs mild next to the all-in-for-Trump documentary screeds of Dinesh D¡ÇSouza), and there are worse ways to get to know someone like Thomas than to watch him deliver what is basically the visual version of an I-did-it-my-way audiobook memoir, with lots of news clips and photographs to illustrate his words. The first half of the movie draws you in, because it¡Çs basically the story of how Thomas, born in 1948 in the rural community of Pin Point, Georgia, was raised in a penniless family who spoke the creole language of Gullah, and of how he pulled himself up by his bootstraps. After a fire left the family homeless, he and his brother went off to Savannah to live with their grandfather, an illiterate but sternly disciplined taskmaster who gave Thomas his backbone of self-reliance. He entered Conception Seminary College when he was 16, and he loved it ? but in a story Thomas has often told, he left the seminary after the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. when he overheard a fellow student make an ugly remark about King. That¡Çs a telling anecdote, but there¡Çs a reason Thomas showcases it the way he does. It¡Çs his one official grand statement of racial outrage. In ¡ÈCreated Equal, ¡É he talks for two hours but says next to nothing about his feelings on the Civil Rights movement, or on what it was like to be raised in the Jim Crow South. As a student at Holy Cross, the Jesuit liberal arts college near Boston, he joined a crew of black ¡Èrevolutionaries¡É and dressed the part in Army fatigues, but he now mocks that stage of his development, cutting right to his conservative awakening, which coalesced around the issue of busing. Thomas thought it was nuts to bus black kids from Roxbury to schools in South Boston that were every bit as bad as the ones they were already attending. And maybe he was right. Thomas, using busing and welfare as his example, decries the liberal dream as a series of idealistic engineering projects that human beings were then wedged into. There may be aspects of truth to that critique, but liberalism was also rolling up its sleeves to grapple with the agony of injustice. The philosophy that Thomas evolved had a connect-the-dots perfection to it: Treat everyone equal! Period! How easy! It certainly sounds good on paper, yet you want to ask: Couldn¡Çt one use the same logic that rejects affirmative action programs to reject anti-discrimination law? Thomas projects out from his own example: He came from nothing and made something of himself, so why can¡Çt everyone else? But he never stops to consider that he was, in fact, an unusually gifted man. His aw-shucks manner makes him likably unpretentious, but where¡Çs his empathy for all the people who weren¡Çt as talented or lucky? In ¡ÈCreated Equal, ¡É Thomas continues to treat Anita Hill¡Çs testimony against him as part of a liberal smear campaign ? and, therefore, as a lie. He compares himself to Tom Robinson, the railroaded black man in ¡ÈTo Kill a Mockingbird, ¡É viewing himself as a pure victim. Thomas¡Ç wife, Virginia Lamp, who sat by his side at the hearings (and is interviewed in the film), stands by him today. But more than two years into the #MeToo revolution, the meaning of the Clarence Thomas/Anita Hill Senate testimony stands clearer than ever. It was the first time in America that a public accusation of sexual harassment shook the earth. The meaning of those hearings transcends the fight over whether one more conservative justice got to be added to the Supreme Court. Thomas now admits that he refused to withdraw his nomination less out of a desire to serve on the Supreme Court than because caving in would have been death to him. ¡ÈI¡Çve never cried uncle, ¡É he says, ¡Èwhether I wanted to be on the Supreme Court or not. ¡É It¡Çs an honest confession, but a little like the Roe v. Wade thing: Where was his intellectual and moral desire to serve on the court? By then, he¡Çd been a federal judge for just 16 months, and he admits that he wasn¡Çt drawn to that job either; but he found that he liked the work. Thomas also explains why, once he had ascended to the high court, he went through a period where, famously, he didn¡Çt ask a single question at a public hearing for more than 10 years. His rationalization (¡ÈThe referee in the game should not be a participant in the game¡É) is, more or less, nonsense. But his silence spoke volumes. It was his passive-aggressive way of turning inward, of treating an appointment he didn¡Çt truly want with anger ? of coasting as a form of rebellion. It was his way of pretending to be his own man, even as he continued to play the hallowed conservative role of good soldier. Best of Variety The Best Albums of the Decade Sign up for Variety¡Çs Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. View photos.
&ref(https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1571603957065-a7d7cbf4cbdf?ixlib=rb-1.2.1) Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words pictures. Clarence Thomas can't wait for another Sexual Creep to join him on the SCOTUS. Sexual Creeps of the United States #SCOTUS. Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words online.
Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words book. Anita Hill was a victim and they just humiliated her.??. I love that last piece about not being afraid to do something if it is right. Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words pdf. Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words 2017.
Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words song. Wait i thought in the US supreme court judges are suppose to be BI-Partisan? what a Joke that is. the two party system is dysfunctional and doesn't work. People care more about whats best for their party rather then whats best for the country. smh. BOOM! He Nailed It. Wow. Didnt know the full extent of this story. Free Online Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own wordstream. Clarence Thomas, arguably the most conservative justice on the U. S. Supreme Court, may be known for his silence on the bench during oral arguments, but now he¡Çs speaking out. In an upcoming documentary, ¡ÈCreated Equal: Clarence Thomas In His Own Words, ¡É Thomas describes his faith, his political awakening, his judicial philosophy, and the role race has played in his life, offering viewers rare insight into the mind of a justice known for his reticence on the public stage. ¡È¡ÆThis is the wrong black guy, he has to be destroyed, '¡É Thomas says at one point in the film, characterizing those who opposed his nomination to the Supreme Court nomination in 1991. ¡ÈJust say it. And now at least we¡Çre honest with each other. ¡É Remembering the moment that Anita Hill¡Çs allegations that he had sexually harassed her were made public, Thomas says, that¡Çs when ¡Èall heck broke loose. ¡É The new documentary, which TIME saw in an intimate advance screening, will be released in 2020 and set to air on PBS in May. It was made by Manifold Productions, which is led by Michael Pack, a conservative filmmaker who has worked with Steve Bannon. President Donald Trump nominated Pack to be the head of the Broadcasting Board of Governors. The film is largely sympathetic to Thomas. On its website, Manifold Productions says the purpose of the movie is to ¡Ètell the Clarence Thomas story truly and fully, without cover-ups or distortions. ¡É Thomas and his wife Virginia are the only people whose interviews appear in the film. (Other voices, including Hill¡Çs, are included in old footage. ) Pack interviewed Thomas for more than 30 hours over a six month period. Speaking after a screening on Oct. 22, he said he worried that including other original interviews would cause him to ¡Èlose Justice Thomas¡Çs voice. ¡É ¡ÈI felt it would also let viewers make up their own mind, ¡É Pack says. ¡ÈMy deal with the audience was to let Justice Thomas tell his story and be fair to his story. ¡É Much of the film addresses the justice¡Çs upbringing, which brought him from poverty in rural Georgia to the highest court in the land, and tracks his personal and political transitions along the way. Get our Politics Newsletter. Sign up to receive the day's most important political stories from Washington and beyond. Thank you! For your security, we've sent a confirmation email to the address you entered. Click the link to confirm your subscription and begin receiving our newsletters. If you don't get the confirmation within 10 minutes, please check your spam folder. But a significant section of the movie also revisits Thomas¡Çs contentious confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee, which was at the time overseen by then-Delaware Senator Joe Biden, who is now running for president. ¡ÈOne of the things you do in hearings is you have to sit there and look attentively at people you know have no idea what they¡Çre talking about, ¡É Thomas says, in reference to a line of questioning from Biden. ¡ÈMost of my opponents on the Judiciary Committee cared about only one thing: how would I rule on abortion rights? ¡É Thomas says. ¡ÈYou really didn¡Çt matter, and your life didn¡Çt matter. What mattered was what they wanted. And what they wanted was this particular issue. ¡É Since joining the Supreme Court, Thomas has voted repeatedly to roll back abortion rights and has urged the court to reconsider Roe v. Wade and other landmark abortion cases. ¡ÈOur abortion jurisprudence has spiraled out of control, ¡É he wrote in 2019. It was after the first round of hearings during which Democratic senators pressed him on his judicial philosophy and abortion that Hill testified that Thomas had sexually harassed her at work. Thomas unequivocally denied each of her allegations then?and he does so again in the documentary. In the film, he recalls feeling ¡Èdeflated¡É when the FBI first came to his house and asked him about Hill¡Çs allegations, and describes the ensuing media onslaught as him being ¡Èliterally under siege. ¡É ¡ÈOh God, no, ¡É Thomas says when Pack asks him whether he watched Hill¡Çs testimony. Thomas says his experience in the hearings made him realize that he had been expecting a certain type of person?as he described them, the ¡Æbigot, Klansman, and rural sheriff¡Ç?to hold him back over the course of his life. But the confirmation hearing changed his mind. ¡ÈIt turned out that through all of that, ultimately the biggest impediment was the modern day liberal, ¡É he says. Thomas says he was in the bathtub when the Senate voted on October 15, 1991 to confirm him to the Supreme Court. ¡ÈMy reaction is still pretty much the way it is now, ¡É Thomas says. ¡ÈI mean, whoop-dee-damn-doo. I wasn¡Çt really all that interested in it. ¡É ¡ÈThe idea was to get rid of me, ¡É Thomas says, describing attempts to derail his nomination. ¡ÈAnd then after I was there, it was to undermine me. ¡É Pack says his on-camera interviews with Thomas ended before Justice Brett Kavanaugh¡Çs confirmation hearing in September 2018 when Christine Blasey Ford accused Kavanaugh of sexual assault. But Pack says Thomas had declined to wade into questions about the #MeToo movement over the course of their interviews. Thomas also speaks about the difficulty he says he has experienced being a prominent black conservative. ¡ÈThere¡Çs different sets of rules for different people, ¡É Thomas says. ¡ÈIf you criticize a black person who¡Çs more liberal, you¡Çre a racist. Whereas you can do whatever to me, or to now [HUD Secretary] Ben Carson, and that¡Çs fine, because you¡Çre not really black because you¡Çre not doing what we expect black people to do. ¡É Thomas speaks in the film about some of the pillars of his life, including his grandfather who raised him, his religion, and his belief in the principles of the Constitution. He also talks about his judicial philosophy, and why he almost never asks a single question during oral arguments. ¡ÈWe are judges, not advocates, ¡É Thomas says. ¡ÈThe referee in the game should not be a participant in the game. ¡É At a low moment in his life, before he becomes a judge, Thomas says he had a reckoning with his purpose and his values. ¡ÈFor what will you die? ¡É he remembers asking himself. ¡ÈIs there something in life you would die for? What about your principles? ¡É Thomas says he decided then that the principles his grandfather raised him with and the principles of this country were worth dying for?and those would shape how he lived. Write to Tessa Berenson at.
Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own wordswn words. Ole Slo-Joe should've been the one being all of his then there was Fat Ted, the Coward-Killer of then Anita Hill who paved the road for Blasey Ford to put on her act! We never learn. News in English ? 09. 02. 2020 ? ¡ÆCreated Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words¡Ç: Film Review If you watch ¡ÈCreated Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words¡É looking for a clue as to Thomas¡Ç inner workings, a key to who Clarence Thomas really is, then you¡Çll have to wait a while before it arrives. But it does. The reason it takes so long is that Thomas, dressed in a red tie, [¡Ä] §¹§Ú§ä§Ñ§Û§ä§Ö §ß§Ñ §£§ã§×, §é§ä§à §á§Ú§ê§å§ä §à, §Ó, §Õ§Ý§ñ §£§Ñ§ê§Ö§Ô§à §Ô§à§â§à§Õ§Ñ §Ú §Õ§Ý§ñ §Ó§ã§Ö§ç §ä§Ö§ç, §Ü§à§Þ§å §ï§ä§à §á§â§à§ã§ä§à §Ú§ß§ä§Ö§â§Ö§ã§ß§à, ? §Ó §ß§Ñ§ê§Ú§ç §Ý§Ö§ß§ä§Ñ§ç §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ö§Û §à§ä §á§Ö§â§Ó§à§Ô§à §Ý§Ú§è§Ñ, §Ò§Ö§Ù §Ü§Ñ§Ü§à§Û §Ò§í §ä§à §ß§Ú §Ò§í§Ý§à §è§Ö§ß§Ù§å§â§í, §Ò§Ö§Ù §á§â§Ú§à§â§Ú§ä§Ö§ä§à§Ó §â§Ö§Õ§Ñ§Ü§ä§à§â§à§Ó, §Ò§Ö§Ù §Ù§Ñ§Ó§Ú§ã§Ú§Þ§à§ã§ä§Ú §à§ä §á§à§Ý§Ú§ä§Ú§é§Ö§ã§Ü§à§Û §Ü§à§ß§ì§ð§ß§Ü§ä§å§â§í, §ß§Ñ§ã§ä§â§à§Ö§ß§Ú§Û, §ä§Ö§é§Ö§ß§Ú§Û §Ú §à§Ò§ã§ä§à§ñ§ä§Ö§Ý§î§ã§ä§Ó. §¯§Ñ§ê §é§Ú§ä§Ñ§ä§Ö§Ý§î §Ó§á§â§Ñ§Ó§Ö §Ù§ß§Ñ§ä§î §Ó§ã§ð §á§â§Ñ§Ó§Õ§å §Ú, §á§à§ï§ä§à§Þ§å: §ß§Ñ§ê §é§Ú§ä§Ñ§ä§Ö§Ý§î - §Ó§ã§Ö§Ô§Õ§Ñ §á§â§Ñ§Ó! §¯§Ñ §Ó§ã§Ö §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ú (§Ó §ä§à§Þ §é§Ú§ã§Ý§Ö §Ú §Ó§Ñ§ê§Ú) §Õ§à§ã§ä§å§á§ß§í §Ó §á§Ö§â§Ö§Ó§à§Õ§Ö §ß§Ñ §á§â§Ñ§Ü§ä§Ú§é§Ö§ã§Ü§Ú §Ý§ð§Ò§à§Û §Ú§Ù §á§à§á§å§Ý§ñ§â§ß§í§ç §ñ§Ù§í§Ü§à§Ó §Þ§Ú§â§Ñ. §¥§Ý§ñ §á§Ö§â§Ö§Ó§à§Õ§Ñ §Õ§à§ã§ä§Ñ§ä§à§é§ß§à §Ó§í§Ò§â§Ñ§ä§î §Ú§Ù §ã§á§Ú§ã§Ü§Ñ §ñ§Ù§í§Ü§à§Ó, §â§Ñ§Ù§Þ§Ö§ë§×§ß§ß§à§Ô§à §Ó §ê§Ñ§á§Ü§Ö §ã§Ñ§Û§ä§Ñ, §Ú§ß§ä§Ö§â§Ö§ã§å§ð§ë§Ú§Û §£§Ñ§ã. §±§Ö§â§Ö§Ó§à§Õ §Ó§í§Ò§â§Ñ§ß§ß§à§Û §ã§ä§â§Ñ§ß§Ú§è§í §Þ§í §à§ã§å§ë§Ö§ã§ä§Ó§Ú§Þ §Þ§Ô§ß§à§Ó§Ö§ß§ß§à §Ó §Ñ§Ó§ä§à§Þ§Ñ§ä§Ú§é§Ö§ã§Ü§à§Þ §â§Ö§Ø§Ú§Þ§Ö §Ú §ã §Ú§ß§Õ§Ö§Ü§ã§Ñ§è§Ú§Ö§Û §é§Ö§â§Ö§Ù §á§à§Ú§ã§Ü§à§Ó§í§Ö §ã§Ú§ã§ä§Ö§Þ§í. §¹§Ú§ä§Ñ§Û§ä§Ö §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ú §ß§Ñ §ñ§Ù§í§Ü§Ñ§ç §Þ§Ú§â§Ñ §å §ß§Ñ§ã §Ó §â§Ö§Ø§Ú§Þ§Ö §à§ß§Ý§Ñ§Û§ß. ? §£§Ñ§ê §Þ§Ú§â §Ò§Ö§Ù §Ô§â§Ñ§ß§Ú§è §Ú §ñ§Ù§í§Ü§à§Ó§í§ç §Ò§Ñ§â§î§Ö§â§à§Ó! §¡ §ã §ß§Ö§Õ§Ñ§Ó§ß§Ö§Ô§à §Ó§â§Ö§Þ§Ö§ß§Ú §Þ§í §Õ§à§Ò§Ñ§Ó§Ú§Ý§Ú §Ú §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ú §á§à §â§Ñ§Ù§Õ§Ö§Ý§Ñ§Þ, §Ü§Ñ§ä§Ö§Ô§à§â§Ú§ñ§Þ, §Ú§ß§ä§Ö§â§Ö§ã§Ñ§Þ §Ú §Ò§Ý§à§Ô§Ñ§Þ, §é§ä§à §á§à§Ù§Ó§à§Ý§ñ§Ö§ä §á§à§Ý§å§é§Ú§ä§î §á§à§Ý§î§Ù§à§Ó§Ñ§ä§Ö§Ý§ð §ã§Ö§â§Ó§Ú§ã§Ñ §ß§Ö §ä§à§Ý§î§Ü§à §à§á§Ö§â§Ñ§ä§Ú§Ó§ß§å§ð, §ß§à §Ú §Ñ§Ý§î§ä§Ö§â§ß§Ñ§ä§Ú§Ó§ß§å§ð §Ú§ß§æ§à§â§Þ§Ñ§è§Ú§ð §á§à §Ú§ß§ä§Ö§â§Ö§ã§å§ð§ë§Ö§Û §ä§Ö§Þ§Ö §ã§à §Ó§ã§Ö§Ô§à §Þ§Ú§â§Ñ, §à§ä §ã§à§Ó§Ö§â§ê§Ö§ß§ß§à §â§Ñ§Ù§ß§í§ç §ß§Ö§Ù§Ñ§Ó§Ú§ã§Ú§Þ§í§ç §á§à§á§å§Ý§ñ§â§ß§í§ç §Ú §ß§Ö §à§é§Ö§ß§î §Ú§ã§ä§à§é§ß§Ú§Ü§à§Ó §ß§Ñ §à§Õ§ß§à§Û §ã§ä§â§Ñ§ß§Ú§è§Ö. §³§Ö§â§Ó§Ú§ã §ä§Ñ§Ü§Ø§Ö §á§à§Ù§Ó§à§Ý§ñ§Ö§ä §á§â§à§ã§Þ§à§ä§â§Ö§ä§î §Ó§ã§ð §Ý§Ö§ß§ä§å §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ö§Û §á§à §Ü§Ñ§Ø§Õ§à§Þ§å §Ú§ã§ä§à§é§ß§Ú§Ü§å §Ú§ß§æ§à§â§Þ§Ñ§è§Ú§Ú §à§ä§Õ§Ö§Ý§î§ß§à §Ó §æ§à§â§Þ§Ñ§ä§Ö §Ü§Ñ§Ý§Ö§ß§Õ§Ñ§â§ñ §Ù§Ñ §Ý§ð§Ò§å§ð §Ó§í§Ò§â§Ñ§ß§ß§å§ð §Õ§Ñ§ä§å §Ú §á§Ö§â§Ú§à§Õ. §´§à§Ó§Ñ§â§í §Ú §å§ã§Ý§å§Ô§Ú §à§ä §â§Ö§Ü§Ý§Ñ§Þ§à§Õ§Ñ§ä§Ö§Ý§Ö§Û (§é§ä§à §Ú §Ô§Õ§Ö §Ü§å§á§Ú§ä§î §ã§Ö§Ô§à§Õ§ß§ñ §Ó §â§Ö§Ô§Ú§à§ß§Ö) §¯§Ö§Õ§Ñ§Ó§ß§à §á§â§à§ã§Þ§Ñ§ä§â§Ú§Ó§Ñ§Ý§Ú §Ó §â§Ö§Ü§Ý§Ñ§Þ§ß§í§ç §á§â§Ö§Õ§Ý§à§Ø§Ö§ß§Ú§ñ§ç: ? §á§à§Ú§ã§Ü§à§Ó§í§Û §Ú§ã§ä§à§é§ß§Ú§Ü §Ñ§Ü§ä§å§Ñ§Ý§î§ß§à§Û §Ú§ß§æ§à§â§Þ§Ñ§è§Ú§Ú §ß§Ö §ä§à§Ý§î§Ü§à §à §á§à§Ó§ã§Ö§Õ§ß§Ö§Ó§ß§à§Û §Ø§Ú§Ù§ß§Ú §£§Ñ§ê§Ö§Ô§à §Ô§à§â§à§Õ§Ñ §Ú §Ô§à§â§à§Õ§à§Ó §£§Ñ§ê§Ö§Ô§à §â§Ö§Ô§Ú§à§ß§Ñ, §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§ñ§ç, §ã§à§Ò§í§ä§Ú§ñ§ç §Ú §á§â§à§Ú§ã§ê§Ö§ã§ä§Ó§Ú§ñ§ç, §ß§à §Ú §á§Ñ§â§ä§ß§×§â§ã§Ü§Ñ§ñ §Ú§ß§ä§Ö§â§ß§Ö§ä-§Ó§Ú§ä§â§Ú§ß§Ñ §Ñ§Ü§ä§å§Ñ§Ý§î§ß§í§ç §ä§à§Ó§Ñ§â§ß§í§ç §á§â§Ö§Õ§Ý§à§Ø§Ö§ß§Ú§Û §ã §Õ§à§ã§ä§Ñ§Ó§Ü§à§Û §Ó §£§Ñ§ê§Ö§Þ §Ô§à§â§à§Õ§Ö. §¦§Ø§Ö§Õ§ß§Ö§Ó§ß§à §ß§Ñ §ß§Ñ§ê§Ö§Þ §ã§Ñ§Û§ä§Ö §á§à§ñ§Ó§Ý§ñ§Ö§ä§ã§ñ, §à§Ò§ß§à§Ó§Ý§ñ§Ö§ä§ã§ñ §Ú §Õ§à§á§à§Ý§ß§ñ§Ö§ä§ã§ñ §ã§Ñ§Þ§Ñ§ñ §ã§Ó§Ö§Ø§Ñ§ñ §Ú§ß§æ§à§â§Þ§Ñ§è§Ú§ñ §à §ä§à§Ó§Ñ§â§Ñ§ç §Ú §å§ã§Ý§å§Ô§Ñ§ç, §Ñ§Ü§è§Ú§ñ§ç §Ú §ã§Ü§Ú§Õ§Ü§Ñ§ç §ß§Ñ §ã§Ñ§Þ§í§Ö §â§Ñ§Ù§ß§í§Ö §ä§Ö§Þ§í §à§ä §ß§Ö§Õ§Ó§Ú§Ø§Ú§Þ§à§ã§ä§Ú §Ú §Ñ§Ó§ä§à§Þ§à§Ò§Ú§Ý§Ö§Û §Õ§à §â§Ñ§Ù§Ý§Ú§é§ß§í§ç §Ö§Ø§Ö§Õ§ß§Ö§Ó§ß§í§ç §å§ã§Ý§å§Ô, §Þ§à§Ò§Ú§Ý§î§ß§í§ç §á§â§Ú§Ý§à§Ø§Ö§ß§Ú§Û §Ú §ã§Ñ§Þ§í§ç §ã§Ó§Ö§Ø§Ú§ç §á§â§Ö§Õ§Ý§à§Ø§Ö§ß§Ú§Û §Þ§Ö§ã§ä§ß§í§ç §Ú§ß§ä§Ö§â§ß§Ö§ä-§Þ§Ñ§Ô§Ñ§Ù§Ú§ß§à§Ó §Ú §á§â§Ö§Õ§á§â§Ú§ñ§ä§Ú§Û §æ§Ñ§Ü§ä§Ú§é§Ö§ã§Ü§Ú §á§à §Ó§ã§Ö§Þ §Ô§à§â§à§Õ§Ñ§Þ §Ú §â§Ö§Ô§Ú§à§ß§Ñ§Þ §²§à§ã§ã§Ú§Ú, §µ§Ü§â§Ñ§Ú§ß§í, §¢§Ö§Ý§à§â§å§ã§ã§Ú§Ú §Ú §¡§Ò§ç§Ñ§Ù§Ú§Ú. §£§ã§Ö§Ô§Õ§Ñ ? §Ø§Ú§Ó§Ñ§ñ §Ú§ß§æ§à§â§Þ§Ñ§è§Ú§ñ, §Ó§ã§Ö§Ô§Õ§Ñ ? §Ñ§Ü§ä§å§Ñ§Ý§î§ß§í§Ö §è§Ö§ß§í. ? §ä§à§Ý§î§Ü§à §ã§Ó§Ö§Ø§Ú§Ö §Ú§ß§ä§Ö§â§ß§Ö§ä-§á§â§Ö§Õ§Ý§à§Ø§Ö§ß§Ú§ñ §Ó §â§Ö§Ô§Ú§à§ß§Ñ§ç (§Ö§Ø§Ö§Þ§Ú§ß§å§ä§ß§à§Ö §à§Ò§ß§à§Ó§Ý§Ö§ß§Ú§Ö §Ó §â§Ö§Ø§Ú§Þ§Ö §à§ß§Ý§Ñ§Û§ß). §¬§ä§à §ß§Ö §å§ã§á§Ö§Ý ? §ä§à§ä §à§á§à§Ù§Õ§Ñ§Ý, §Ü§ä§à §à§á§à§Ù§Õ§Ñ§Ý ? §ä§à§ä §à§ä§ã§ä§Ñ§Ý! §¢§å§Õ§î §Ó §Ü§å§â§ã§Ö §ß§à§Ó§à§Ô§à ? §è§Ö§ß§Ú §Ó§â§Ö§Þ§ñ! §±§â§à§Þ§Ö§Õ§Ý§Ú§ê§î §ä§í, §Õ§â§å§Ô§à§Û §å§ã§á§Ö§Ö§ä! ? §ß§à§Ó§í§Û §æ§à§â§Þ§Ñ§ä §á§à§Õ§Ñ§é§Ú §Ú§ß§æ§à§â§Þ§Ñ§è§Ú§Ú, §ß§à§Ó§í§Û §æ§à§â§Þ§Ñ§ä §ß§à§Ó§à§Ô§à §Ó§â§Ö§Þ§Ö§ß§Ú! §£ §Ü§Ñ§Ø§Õ§à§Þ §ã§Ý§à§Ó§Ö ? §Ù§ß§Ñ§é§Ö§ß§Ú§Ö, §Ó §Ü§Ñ§Ø§Õ§à§Þ §Ò§Ñ§ß§ß§Ö§â§Ö ? §ã§Þ§í§ã§Ý! §£§ã§ñ §Ú§ß§ä§Ö§â§ß§Ö§ä-§Ó§Ú§ä§â§Ú§ß§Ñ ? §Ù§Õ§Ö§ã§î. §±§à§ã§Ý§Ö§Õ§ß§Ú§Ö §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ú §ß§Ñ §ã§Ö§Ô§à§Õ§ß§ñ §á§à §£§Ñ§ê§Ö§Þ§å §Ô§à§â§à§Õ§å, §é§Ñ§ã§ä§ß§í§Ö §à§Ò§ì§ñ§Ó§Ý§Ö§ß§Ú§ñ, §ã§Ñ§Þ§í§Ö §á§à§Ý§ß§í§Ö §Ý§Ö§ß§ä§í §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ö§Û §à§ä §ß§Ñ§ê§Ú§ç §á§à§ã§ä§à§ñ§ß§ß§í§ç §Ñ§Ó§ä§à§â§à§Ó §Ó §Þ§à§Ò§Ú§Ý§î§ß§à§Þ §æ§à§â§Þ§Ñ§ä§Ö, §Ü§Ñ§Ý§Ö§ß§Õ§Ñ§â§ß§í§Û §Ñ§â§ç§Ú§Ó §ã§à§Ò§í§ä§Ú§Û §Ó §²§à§ã§ã§Ú§Ú, §µ§Ü§â§Ñ§Ú§ß§Ö §Ú §Þ§Ú§â§Ö, §á§à§á§å§Ý§ñ§â§ß§í§Ö §â§Ñ§Ù§Õ§Ö§Ý§í: §±§â§à§Ú§ã§ê§Ö§ã§ä§Ó§Ú§ñ, §³§á§à§â§ä, §¡§Ó§ä§à, §¤§Ý§Ñ§Þ§å§â, §¢§Ý§à§Ô§Ú §Ú §Õ§â§å§Ô§Ú§Ö §ã §á§â§ñ§Þ§í§Þ§Ú §á§Ö§â§Ö§ç§à§Õ§Ñ§Þ§Ú §ß§Ñ §á§Ö§â§Ó§à§Ú§ã§ä§à§é§ß§Ú§Ü§Ú - §á§â§à§ã§ä§à, §Õ§à§ã§ä§å§á§ß§à, §å§Õ§à§Ò§ß§à §å§Ø§Ö §ã§Ö§Ô§à§Õ§ß§ñ §Ú §ã§Ö§Û§é§Ñ§ã §ß§Ñ §á§Ý§Ñ§ä§æ§à§â§Þ§Ö §¯§Ú §à§Õ§Ú§ß §Ó§Ñ§ê §à§ä§Ù§í§Ó, §Ü§à§Þ§Þ§Ö§ß§ä§Ñ§â§Ú§Û §ß§Ö §à§ã§ä§Ñ§ß§Ö§ä§ã§ñ §ß§Ö§Ù§Ñ§Þ§Ö§é§Ö§ß§ß§í§Þ. §®§í §Ó§à§ã§á§â§Ú§Ú§Þ§é§Ú§Ó§í §Ü §Ý§ð§Ò§í§Þ §Ü§â§Ú§ä§Ú§é§Ö§ã§Ü§Ú§Þ §Ù§Ñ§Þ§Ö§é§Ñ§ß§Ú§ñ§Þ §Ú §á§â§Ö§Õ§Ý§à§Ø§Ö§ß§Ú§ñ§Þ §ã §Ó§Ñ§ê§Ö§Û §ã§ä§à§â§à§ß§í 24 §é§Ñ§ã§Ñ §Ó §ã§å§ä§Ü§Ú §Ú §Ó§ã§Ö 7 §Õ§ß§Ö§Û §Ó §ß§Ö§Õ§Ö§Ý§ð §Ò§Ö§Ù §Ó§í§ç§à§Õ§ß§í§ç §Ú §á§Ö§â§Ö§â§í§Ó§à§Ó §ß§Ñ §à§Ò§Ö§Õ. §®§à§Ò§Ú§Ý§î§ß§í§Û §Ó§Ñ§â§Ú§Ñ§ß§ä §á§â§à§Ö§Ü§ä§Ñ ? §Ù§Õ§Ö§ã§î. §¡§Ü§è§Ú§Ú, §ã§Ü§Ú§Õ§Ü§Ú, §â§Ñ§ã§á§â§à§Õ§Ñ§Ø§Ú, §Ø§×§Ý§ä§í§Ö §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ú (16+) §¯§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ú §á§à§ã§Ý§Ö§Õ§ß§Ö§Ô§à §é§Ñ§ã§Ñ §´§à§á-10 §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ö§Û §Ù§Ñ §ã§Ö§Ô§à§Õ§ß§ñ §ß§Ñ §ï§ä§à§ä §é§Ñ§ã: ? §Ò§í§ã§ä§â§Ö§Ö, §é§Ö§Þ §Á..., §ã§Ñ§Þ§í§Ö §ã§Ó§Ö§Ø§Ú§Ö §Ú §Ñ§Ü§ä§å§Ñ§Ý§î§ß§í§Ö §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ú §£§Ñ§ê§Ö§Ô§à §Ô§à§â§à§Õ§Ñ ? §Ü§Ñ§Ø§Õ§í§Û §Õ§Ö§ß§î, §Ü§Ñ§Ø§Õ§í§Û §é§Ñ§ã §ã §Ö§Ø§Ö§Þ§Ú§ß§å§ä§ß§í§Þ §à§Ò§ß§à§Ó§Ý§Ö§ß§Ú§Ö§Þ! §®§Ô§ß§à§Ó§Ö§ß§ß§Ñ§ñ §á§å§Ò§Ý§Ú§Ü§Ñ§è§Ú§ñ §ß§Ñ §ñ§Ù§í§Ü§Ö §à§â§Ú§Ô§Ú§ß§Ñ§Ý§Ñ, §Ò§Ö§Ù §Þ§à§Õ§Ö§â§Ñ§è§Ú§Ú §Ú §Ò§Ö§Ù §Ü§å§á§ð§â §Ó §â§Ñ§Ù§Õ§Ö§Ý§Ö §±§à§Ý§î§Ù§à§Ó§Ñ§ä§Ö§Ý§Ú §ã§Ñ§Û§ä§Ñ §¬§Ñ§Ü §Õ§à§Ò§Ñ§Ó§Ú§ä§î §ã§Ó§à§Ú §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ú §Ó §ß§Ñ§ê§Ú §ä§â§Ñ§ß§ã§Ý§ñ§è§Ú§Ú? §°§é§Ö§ß§î §á§â§à§ã§ä§à. §¥§à§ã§ä§Ñ§ä§à§é§ß§à §à§ä§á§â§Ñ§Ó§Ú§ä§î §Ù§Ñ§ñ§Ó§Ü§å §ß§Ñ §ß§Ñ§ê §ï§Ý§Ö§Ü§ä§â§à§ß§ß§í§Û §Ñ§Õ§â§Ö§ã §ã §å§Ü§Ñ§Ù§Ñ§ß§Ú§Ö§Þ §Ñ§Õ§â§Ö§ã§Ñ §£§Ñ§ê§Ö§Û §Ý§Ö§ß§ä§í §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ö§Û §Ó §æ§à§â§Þ§Ñ§ä§Ö RSS §Ú§Ý§Ú §á§à§Õ§Ñ§ä§î §Ù§Ñ§ñ§Ó§Ü§å §ß§Ñ §Ó§Ü§Ý§ð§é§Ö§ß§Ú§Ö §£§Ñ§ê§Ö§Ô§à §ã§Ñ§Û§ä§Ñ §Ó §ß§Ñ§ê §Ü§Ñ§ä§Ñ§Ý§à§Ô §é§Ö§â§Ö§Ù §æ§à§â§Þ§å. §±§à§ã§Ý§Ö §Þ§à§Õ§Ö§â§Ñ§è§Ú§Ú §Ù§Ñ§ñ§Ó§Ü§Ú §Ó §ä§Ö§é§Ö§ß§Ú§Ú 24 §é§Ñ§ã§à§Ó §£§Ñ§ê§Ñ §Ý§Ö§ß§ä§Ñ §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ö§Û §ß§Ñ§é§ß§×§ä §ä§â§Ñ§ß§ã§Ý§Ú§â§à§Ó§Ñ§ä§î§ã§ñ §Ó §â§Ñ§Ù§Õ§Ö§Ý§Ö §£§Ñ§ê§Ö§Ô§à §Ô§à§â§à§Õ§Ñ. §£§ã§Ö §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ú §Ó §ß§Ñ§ê§Ö§Û §Ý§Ö§ß§ä§Ö §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ö§Û §à§ä§ã§à§â§ä§Ú§â§à§Ó§Ñ§ß§í §á§à§Þ§Ú§ß§å§ä§ß§à §á§à §Ó§â§Ö§Þ§Ö§ß§Ú §á§å§Ò§Ý§Ú§Ü§Ñ§è§Ú§Ú, §Ü§à§ä§à§â§à§Ö §å§Ü§Ñ§Ù§Ñ§ß§à §ß§Ñ§á§â§à§ä§Ú§Ó §Ü§Ñ§Ø§Õ§à§Û §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ú §ã§á§â§Ñ§Ó§Ñ §ä§Ñ§Ü§Ø§Ö §Ü§Ñ§Ü §Ú §á§â§ñ§Þ§Ñ§ñ §ã§ã§í§Ý§Ü§Ñ §ß§Ñ §Ú§ã§ä§à§é§ß§Ú§Ü §Ú§ß§æ§à§â§Þ§Ñ§è§Ú§Ú. §¦§ã§Ý§Ú §å §£§Ñ§ã §Ö§ã§ä§î §Ú§ß§ä§Ö§â§Ö§ã§ß§í§Ö §æ§à§ä§à §£§Ñ§ê§Ö§Ô§à §Ô§à§â§à§Õ§Ñ §Ú§Ý§Ú §Õ§â§å§Ô§Ú§ç §ß§Ñ§ã§Ö§Ý§×§ß§ß§í§ç §á§å§ß§Ü§ä§à§Ó §£§Ñ§ê§Ö§Ô§à §â§Ö§Ô§Ú§à§ß§Ñ §Þ§í §ä§Ñ§Ü§Ø§Ö §Ô§à§ä§à§Ó§í §à§á§å§Ò§Ý§Ú§Ü§à§Ó§Ñ§ä§î §Ú§ç §Ó §â§Ñ§Ù§Õ§Ö§Ý§Ö §£§Ñ§ê§Ö§Ô§à §Ô§à§â§à§Õ§Ñ §Ó §ß§Ñ§ê§Ö§Þ §Ü§Ñ§ä§Ñ§Ý§à§Ô§Ö §â§Ö§Ô§Ú§à§ß§Ñ§Ý§î§ß§í§ç §ã§Ñ§Û§ä§à§Ó, §Ü§à§ä§à§â§í§Û §ß§Ñ §ã§Ö§Ô§à§Õ§ß§ñ§ê§ß§Ú§Û §Õ§Ö§ß§î §ñ§Ó§Ý§ñ§Ö§ä§ã§ñ §ã§Ñ§Þ§í§Þ §Ò§à§Ý§î§ê§Ú§Þ §â§Ö§Ô§Ú§à§ß§Ñ§Ý§î§ß§í§Þ §â§Ö§ã§å§â§ã§à§Þ, §à§ç§Ó§Ñ§ä§í§Ó§Ñ§ð§ë§Ú§Þ §Ó§ã§Ö §Ô§à§â§à§Õ§Ñ §ß§Ö §ä§à§Ý§î§Ü§à §²§à§ã§ã§Ú§Ú §Ú §µ§Ü§â§Ñ§Ú§ß§í, §ß§à §Ö§ë§× §Ú §¢§Ö§Ý§à§â§å§ã§ã§Ú§Ú §Ú §¡§Ò§ç§Ñ§Ù§Ú§Ú. §±§â§Ú§ã§Ý§Ñ§ä§î §æ§à§ä§à §Þ§à§Ø§ß§à §Ù§Õ§Ö§ã§î. §°§á§Ö§â§Ñ§ä§Ú§Ó§ß§à §â§Ñ§Ù§Þ§Ö§ã§ä§Ú§ä§î §ã§Ó§à§ð §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§î §Ó §Þ§à§Ø§ß§à §ã§Ñ§Þ§à§ã§ä§à§ñ§ä§Ö§Ý§î§ß§à §é§Ö§â§Ö§Ù §æ§à§â§Þ§å. §¥§â§å§Ô§Ú§Ö §á§à§á§å§Ý§ñ§â§ß§í§Ö §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ú §Õ§ß§ñ §ã§Ö§Ô§à§Õ§ß§ñ §´§à§á-4 §Ñ§ß§à§ß§ã§à§Ó §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ö§Û §à§ä §á§Ñ§â§ä§ß§×§â§à§Ó: ? §Ö§Ø§Ö§Õ§ß§Ö§Ó§ß§Ú§Ü §Ô§Ý§Ñ§Ó§ß§í§ç §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ö§Û §£§Ñ§ê§Ö§Ô§à §Ô§à§â§à§Õ§Ñ §Ú §£§Ñ§ê§Ö§Ô§à §â§Ö§Ô§Ú§à§ß§Ñ. - §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ú §Ó §Õ§Ö§ä§Ñ§Ý§ñ§ç, §ã§Ó§Ö§Ø§Ú§Û, §ß§Ö§Ù§Ñ§Þ§í§Ý§Ö§ß§ß§í§Û §à§Ò§â§Ñ§Ù §ã§à§Ò§í§ä§Ú§Û §Õ§ß§ñ, §Ñ§ß§Ñ§Ý§Ú§ä§Ú§Ü§Ñ §Þ§Ú§ß§å§Ó§ê§Ú§ç §ã§à§Ò§í§ä§Ú§Û, §á§â§à§Ô§ß§à§Ù§í §ß§Ñ §Ò§å§Õ§å§ë§Ö§Ö §Ú §ß§Ö§á§â§Ö§Õ§Ó§Ù§ñ§ä§í§Û §Ó§Ù§Ô§Ý§ñ§Õ §ß§Ñ §ß§Ñ§ã§ä§à§ñ§ë§Ö§Ö, §Ü§Ñ§Ü §Ó§ã§Ö§Ô§Õ§Ñ, §à§á§Ö§â§Ñ§ä§Ú§Ó§ß§à, §é§Ö§ã§ä§ß§à, §Ò§Ö§Ù §Ü§å§á§ð§â §Ú §è§Ö§ß§Ù§å§â§í §Ü§Ñ§Ø§Õ§í§Û §é§Ñ§ã, §ã§Ö§Þ§î §Õ§ß§Ö§Û §Ó §ß§Ö§Õ§Ö§Ý§ð, 24 §é§Ñ§ã§Ñ §Ó §ã§å§ä§Ü§Ú. §¦§ë§× §Ò§à§Ý§î§ê§Ö §Þ§Ö§ã§ä§ß§í§ç §Ô§à§â§à§Õ§ã§Ü§Ú§ç §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ö§Û §£§Ñ§ê§Ö§Ô§à §Ô§à§â§à§Õ§Ñ ? §ß§Ñ §á§à§â§ä§Ñ§Ý§Ñ§ç §Ú. §±§à§Ý§ß§Ñ§ñ §Ý§Ö§ß§ä§Ñ §â§Ö§Ô§Ú§à§ß§Ñ§Ý§î§ß§í§ç §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ö§Û §ß§Ñ §ï§ä§à§ä §é§Ñ§ã ? §Ù§Õ§Ö§ã§î. §³§Ñ§Þ§í§Ö §ã§Ó§Ö§Ø§Ú§Ö §Ú §á§à§á§å§Ý§ñ§â§ß§í§Ö §á§å§Ò§Ý§Ú§Ü§Ñ§è§Ú§Ú §ã§à§Ò§í§ä§Ú§Û §Ó §²§à§ã§ã§Ú§Ú §Ú §Ó §Þ§Ú§â§Ö §ã§Ö§Ô§à§Õ§ß§ñ - §Ó §´§°§±-100 §Ú §ß§Ñ §ã§Ñ§Û§ä§Ö. §³ 2017 §Ô§à§Õ§Ñ §á§â§à§Ö§Ü§ä §ã§ä§Ñ§Ý §Þ§å§Ý§î§ä§Ú§ñ§Ù§í§é§ß§í§Þ §Ú §â§Ñ§ã§ê§Ú§â§Ú§Ý §ã§Ó§à§ð §Ñ§å§Õ§Ú§ä§à§â§Ú§ð §Ó §Þ§Ú§â§à§Ó§à§Þ §á§â§à§ã§ä§â§Ñ§ß§ã§ä§Ó§Ö. §´§Ö§á§Ö§â§î §ß§Ñ§ã §é§Ú§ä§Ñ§Ö§ä §ß§Ö §ä§à§Ý§î§Ü§à §â§å§ã§ã§Ü§à§ñ§Ù§í§é§ß§Ñ§ñ §Ñ§å§Õ§Ú§ä§à§â§Ú§ñ §Ú §Ø§Ú§ä§Ö§Ý§Ú §Ò§í§Ó§ê§Ö§Ô§à §³§³§³§², §ß§à §Ú §Ó§Ö§ã§î §ã§à§Ó§â§Ö§Þ§Ö§ß§ß§í§Û §Þ§Ú§â. - §Þ§Ú§â §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ö§Û §Ò§Ö§Ù §Ô§â§Ñ§ß§Ú§è §Ú §è§Ö§ß§Ù§å§â§í §Ó §â§Ö§Ø§Ú§Þ§Ö §â§Ö§Ñ§Ý§î§ß§à§Ô§à §Ó§â§Ö§Þ§Ö§ß§Ú. §¬§Ñ§Ø§Õ§å§ð §Þ§Ú§ß§å§ä§å - 123 §ã§Ñ§Þ§
¡ÈI believe him, not her.¡É - Joe Biden. Free Online Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own words of wisdom. Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words quotes. Critics Consensus No consensus yet. 29% TOMATOMETER Total Count: 14 98% Audience Score Verified Ratings: 55 Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words Ratings & Reviews Explanation Tickets & Showtimes The movie doesn't seem to be playing near you. Go back Enter your location to see showtimes near you. Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words Videos Movie Info Although Clarence Thomas remains a controversial figure, loved by some, reviled by others, few know much more than a few headlines and the recollections of his contentious confirmation battle with Anita Hill. With unprecedented access, the producers interviewed Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife, Virginia, for over 30 hours of interview time, over many months. Justice Thomas tells his entire life's story, looking directly at the camera, speaking frankly to the audience. After a brief introduction, the documentary proceeds chronologically, combining Justice Thomas' first person account with a rich array of historical archive material, period and original music, personal photos, and evocative recreations. Unscripted and without narration, the documentary takes the viewer through this complex and often painful life, dealing with race, faith, power, jurisprudence, and personal resilience. Rating: NR Genre: Directed By: Written By: In Theaters: Jan 31, 2020 limited Runtime: 116 minutes Studio: Manifold Productions Cast Critic Reviews for Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words Audience Reviews for Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words There are no featured audience reviews for Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words at this time. See All Audience Reviews Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words Quotes Movie & TV guides.
Released January 31, 2020 PG-13, 1 hr 56 min Documentary Tell us where you are Looking for movie tickets? Enter your location to see which movie theaters are playing Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words near you. ENTER CITY, STATE OR ZIP CODE GO Sign up for a FANALERT® and be the first to know when tickets and other exclusives are available in your area. Also sign me up for FanMail to get updates on all things movies: tickets, special offers, screenings + more. Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words: Trailer 1 1 of 1 Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words Synopsis With unprecedented access, the producers interviewed Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife, Virginia, for over 30 hours of interview time, over many months. Justice Thomas tells his entire life¡Çs story, looking directly at the camera, speaking frankly to the audience. Read Full Synopsis Movie Reviews Presented by Rotten Tomatoes More Info Rated PG-13 | For Some Sexual References and Thematic Elements.
Tuesday, February 11, 2020 Details RESERVE YOUR SEATS RIGHT HERE: A superb documentary delivers a measure of justice to an extraordinary justice. Among the most prominent figures in American politics, perhaps none is as poorly understood as Justice Clarence Thomas. Watching him tell his riveting story at length on camera for the first time, it becomes evident that the man has been deeply wronged ? maligned, disparaged, written off. Thomas may be the most famously silent public figure since Calvin Coolidge. But he has much to say in Michael Pack¡Çs excellent documentary Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words, a measure of long-delayed redress for Thomas¡Çs reputation. Should Thomas remain on the high court until his 80th birthday, as has become common, he would become the longest-serving justice in U. S. history. May he have that last laugh.
Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words lyrics.
There is no way that lady made any of those things up you got some piece of s.
Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words song. Wait i thought in the US supreme court judges are suppose to be BI-Partisan? what a Joke that is. the two party system is dysfunctional and doesn't work. People care more about whats best for their party rather then whats best for the country. smh. BOOM! He Nailed It. Wow. Didnt know the full extent of this story. Free Online Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own wordstream. Clarence Thomas, arguably the most conservative justice on the U. S. Supreme Court, may be known for his silence on the bench during oral arguments, but now he¡Çs speaking out. In an upcoming documentary, ¡ÈCreated Equal: Clarence Thomas In His Own Words, ¡É Thomas describes his faith, his political awakening, his judicial philosophy, and the role race has played in his life, offering viewers rare insight into the mind of a justice known for his reticence on the public stage. ¡È¡ÆThis is the wrong black guy, he has to be destroyed, '¡É Thomas says at one point in the film, characterizing those who opposed his nomination to the Supreme Court nomination in 1991. ¡ÈJust say it. And now at least we¡Çre honest with each other. ¡É Remembering the moment that Anita Hill¡Çs allegations that he had sexually harassed her were made public, Thomas says, that¡Çs when ¡Èall heck broke loose. ¡É The new documentary, which TIME saw in an intimate advance screening, will be released in 2020 and set to air on PBS in May. It was made by Manifold Productions, which is led by Michael Pack, a conservative filmmaker who has worked with Steve Bannon. President Donald Trump nominated Pack to be the head of the Broadcasting Board of Governors. The film is largely sympathetic to Thomas. On its website, Manifold Productions says the purpose of the movie is to ¡Ètell the Clarence Thomas story truly and fully, without cover-ups or distortions. ¡É Thomas and his wife Virginia are the only people whose interviews appear in the film. (Other voices, including Hill¡Çs, are included in old footage. ) Pack interviewed Thomas for more than 30 hours over a six month period. Speaking after a screening on Oct. 22, he said he worried that including other original interviews would cause him to ¡Èlose Justice Thomas¡Çs voice. ¡É ¡ÈI felt it would also let viewers make up their own mind, ¡É Pack says. ¡ÈMy deal with the audience was to let Justice Thomas tell his story and be fair to his story. ¡É Much of the film addresses the justice¡Çs upbringing, which brought him from poverty in rural Georgia to the highest court in the land, and tracks his personal and political transitions along the way. Get our Politics Newsletter. Sign up to receive the day's most important political stories from Washington and beyond. Thank you! For your security, we've sent a confirmation email to the address you entered. Click the link to confirm your subscription and begin receiving our newsletters. If you don't get the confirmation within 10 minutes, please check your spam folder. But a significant section of the movie also revisits Thomas¡Çs contentious confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee, which was at the time overseen by then-Delaware Senator Joe Biden, who is now running for president. ¡ÈOne of the things you do in hearings is you have to sit there and look attentively at people you know have no idea what they¡Çre talking about, ¡É Thomas says, in reference to a line of questioning from Biden. ¡ÈMost of my opponents on the Judiciary Committee cared about only one thing: how would I rule on abortion rights? ¡É Thomas says. ¡ÈYou really didn¡Çt matter, and your life didn¡Çt matter. What mattered was what they wanted. And what they wanted was this particular issue. ¡É Since joining the Supreme Court, Thomas has voted repeatedly to roll back abortion rights and has urged the court to reconsider Roe v. Wade and other landmark abortion cases. ¡ÈOur abortion jurisprudence has spiraled out of control, ¡É he wrote in 2019. It was after the first round of hearings during which Democratic senators pressed him on his judicial philosophy and abortion that Hill testified that Thomas had sexually harassed her at work. Thomas unequivocally denied each of her allegations then?and he does so again in the documentary. In the film, he recalls feeling ¡Èdeflated¡É when the FBI first came to his house and asked him about Hill¡Çs allegations, and describes the ensuing media onslaught as him being ¡Èliterally under siege. ¡É ¡ÈOh God, no, ¡É Thomas says when Pack asks him whether he watched Hill¡Çs testimony. Thomas says his experience in the hearings made him realize that he had been expecting a certain type of person?as he described them, the ¡Æbigot, Klansman, and rural sheriff¡Ç?to hold him back over the course of his life. But the confirmation hearing changed his mind. ¡ÈIt turned out that through all of that, ultimately the biggest impediment was the modern day liberal, ¡É he says. Thomas says he was in the bathtub when the Senate voted on October 15, 1991 to confirm him to the Supreme Court. ¡ÈMy reaction is still pretty much the way it is now, ¡É Thomas says. ¡ÈI mean, whoop-dee-damn-doo. I wasn¡Çt really all that interested in it. ¡É ¡ÈThe idea was to get rid of me, ¡É Thomas says, describing attempts to derail his nomination. ¡ÈAnd then after I was there, it was to undermine me. ¡É Pack says his on-camera interviews with Thomas ended before Justice Brett Kavanaugh¡Çs confirmation hearing in September 2018 when Christine Blasey Ford accused Kavanaugh of sexual assault. But Pack says Thomas had declined to wade into questions about the #MeToo movement over the course of their interviews. Thomas also speaks about the difficulty he says he has experienced being a prominent black conservative. ¡ÈThere¡Çs different sets of rules for different people, ¡É Thomas says. ¡ÈIf you criticize a black person who¡Çs more liberal, you¡Çre a racist. Whereas you can do whatever to me, or to now [HUD Secretary] Ben Carson, and that¡Çs fine, because you¡Çre not really black because you¡Çre not doing what we expect black people to do. ¡É Thomas speaks in the film about some of the pillars of his life, including his grandfather who raised him, his religion, and his belief in the principles of the Constitution. He also talks about his judicial philosophy, and why he almost never asks a single question during oral arguments. ¡ÈWe are judges, not advocates, ¡É Thomas says. ¡ÈThe referee in the game should not be a participant in the game. ¡É At a low moment in his life, before he becomes a judge, Thomas says he had a reckoning with his purpose and his values. ¡ÈFor what will you die? ¡É he remembers asking himself. ¡ÈIs there something in life you would die for? What about your principles? ¡É Thomas says he decided then that the principles his grandfather raised him with and the principles of this country were worth dying for?and those would shape how he lived. Write to Tessa Berenson at.
Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own wordswn words. Ole Slo-Joe should've been the one being all of his then there was Fat Ted, the Coward-Killer of then Anita Hill who paved the road for Blasey Ford to put on her act! We never learn. News in English ? 09. 02. 2020 ? ¡ÆCreated Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words¡Ç: Film Review If you watch ¡ÈCreated Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words¡É looking for a clue as to Thomas¡Ç inner workings, a key to who Clarence Thomas really is, then you¡Çll have to wait a while before it arrives. But it does. The reason it takes so long is that Thomas, dressed in a red tie, [¡Ä] §¹§Ú§ä§Ñ§Û§ä§Ö §ß§Ñ §£§ã§×, §é§ä§à §á§Ú§ê§å§ä §à, §Ó, §Õ§Ý§ñ §£§Ñ§ê§Ö§Ô§à §Ô§à§â§à§Õ§Ñ §Ú §Õ§Ý§ñ §Ó§ã§Ö§ç §ä§Ö§ç, §Ü§à§Þ§å §ï§ä§à §á§â§à§ã§ä§à §Ú§ß§ä§Ö§â§Ö§ã§ß§à, ? §Ó §ß§Ñ§ê§Ú§ç §Ý§Ö§ß§ä§Ñ§ç §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ö§Û §à§ä §á§Ö§â§Ó§à§Ô§à §Ý§Ú§è§Ñ, §Ò§Ö§Ù §Ü§Ñ§Ü§à§Û §Ò§í §ä§à §ß§Ú §Ò§í§Ý§à §è§Ö§ß§Ù§å§â§í, §Ò§Ö§Ù §á§â§Ú§à§â§Ú§ä§Ö§ä§à§Ó §â§Ö§Õ§Ñ§Ü§ä§à§â§à§Ó, §Ò§Ö§Ù §Ù§Ñ§Ó§Ú§ã§Ú§Þ§à§ã§ä§Ú §à§ä §á§à§Ý§Ú§ä§Ú§é§Ö§ã§Ü§à§Û §Ü§à§ß§ì§ð§ß§Ü§ä§å§â§í, §ß§Ñ§ã§ä§â§à§Ö§ß§Ú§Û, §ä§Ö§é§Ö§ß§Ú§Û §Ú §à§Ò§ã§ä§à§ñ§ä§Ö§Ý§î§ã§ä§Ó. §¯§Ñ§ê §é§Ú§ä§Ñ§ä§Ö§Ý§î §Ó§á§â§Ñ§Ó§Ö §Ù§ß§Ñ§ä§î §Ó§ã§ð §á§â§Ñ§Ó§Õ§å §Ú, §á§à§ï§ä§à§Þ§å: §ß§Ñ§ê §é§Ú§ä§Ñ§ä§Ö§Ý§î - §Ó§ã§Ö§Ô§Õ§Ñ §á§â§Ñ§Ó! §¯§Ñ §Ó§ã§Ö §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ú (§Ó §ä§à§Þ §é§Ú§ã§Ý§Ö §Ú §Ó§Ñ§ê§Ú) §Õ§à§ã§ä§å§á§ß§í §Ó §á§Ö§â§Ö§Ó§à§Õ§Ö §ß§Ñ §á§â§Ñ§Ü§ä§Ú§é§Ö§ã§Ü§Ú §Ý§ð§Ò§à§Û §Ú§Ù §á§à§á§å§Ý§ñ§â§ß§í§ç §ñ§Ù§í§Ü§à§Ó §Þ§Ú§â§Ñ. §¥§Ý§ñ §á§Ö§â§Ö§Ó§à§Õ§Ñ §Õ§à§ã§ä§Ñ§ä§à§é§ß§à §Ó§í§Ò§â§Ñ§ä§î §Ú§Ù §ã§á§Ú§ã§Ü§Ñ §ñ§Ù§í§Ü§à§Ó, §â§Ñ§Ù§Þ§Ö§ë§×§ß§ß§à§Ô§à §Ó §ê§Ñ§á§Ü§Ö §ã§Ñ§Û§ä§Ñ, §Ú§ß§ä§Ö§â§Ö§ã§å§ð§ë§Ú§Û §£§Ñ§ã. §±§Ö§â§Ö§Ó§à§Õ §Ó§í§Ò§â§Ñ§ß§ß§à§Û §ã§ä§â§Ñ§ß§Ú§è§í §Þ§í §à§ã§å§ë§Ö§ã§ä§Ó§Ú§Þ §Þ§Ô§ß§à§Ó§Ö§ß§ß§à §Ó §Ñ§Ó§ä§à§Þ§Ñ§ä§Ú§é§Ö§ã§Ü§à§Þ §â§Ö§Ø§Ú§Þ§Ö §Ú §ã §Ú§ß§Õ§Ö§Ü§ã§Ñ§è§Ú§Ö§Û §é§Ö§â§Ö§Ù §á§à§Ú§ã§Ü§à§Ó§í§Ö §ã§Ú§ã§ä§Ö§Þ§í. §¹§Ú§ä§Ñ§Û§ä§Ö §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ú §ß§Ñ §ñ§Ù§í§Ü§Ñ§ç §Þ§Ú§â§Ñ §å §ß§Ñ§ã §Ó §â§Ö§Ø§Ú§Þ§Ö §à§ß§Ý§Ñ§Û§ß. ? §£§Ñ§ê §Þ§Ú§â §Ò§Ö§Ù §Ô§â§Ñ§ß§Ú§è §Ú §ñ§Ù§í§Ü§à§Ó§í§ç §Ò§Ñ§â§î§Ö§â§à§Ó! §¡ §ã §ß§Ö§Õ§Ñ§Ó§ß§Ö§Ô§à §Ó§â§Ö§Þ§Ö§ß§Ú §Þ§í §Õ§à§Ò§Ñ§Ó§Ú§Ý§Ú §Ú §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ú §á§à §â§Ñ§Ù§Õ§Ö§Ý§Ñ§Þ, §Ü§Ñ§ä§Ö§Ô§à§â§Ú§ñ§Þ, §Ú§ß§ä§Ö§â§Ö§ã§Ñ§Þ §Ú §Ò§Ý§à§Ô§Ñ§Þ, §é§ä§à §á§à§Ù§Ó§à§Ý§ñ§Ö§ä §á§à§Ý§å§é§Ú§ä§î §á§à§Ý§î§Ù§à§Ó§Ñ§ä§Ö§Ý§ð §ã§Ö§â§Ó§Ú§ã§Ñ §ß§Ö §ä§à§Ý§î§Ü§à §à§á§Ö§â§Ñ§ä§Ú§Ó§ß§å§ð, §ß§à §Ú §Ñ§Ý§î§ä§Ö§â§ß§Ñ§ä§Ú§Ó§ß§å§ð §Ú§ß§æ§à§â§Þ§Ñ§è§Ú§ð §á§à §Ú§ß§ä§Ö§â§Ö§ã§å§ð§ë§Ö§Û §ä§Ö§Þ§Ö §ã§à §Ó§ã§Ö§Ô§à §Þ§Ú§â§Ñ, §à§ä §ã§à§Ó§Ö§â§ê§Ö§ß§ß§à §â§Ñ§Ù§ß§í§ç §ß§Ö§Ù§Ñ§Ó§Ú§ã§Ú§Þ§í§ç §á§à§á§å§Ý§ñ§â§ß§í§ç §Ú §ß§Ö §à§é§Ö§ß§î §Ú§ã§ä§à§é§ß§Ú§Ü§à§Ó §ß§Ñ §à§Õ§ß§à§Û §ã§ä§â§Ñ§ß§Ú§è§Ö. §³§Ö§â§Ó§Ú§ã §ä§Ñ§Ü§Ø§Ö §á§à§Ù§Ó§à§Ý§ñ§Ö§ä §á§â§à§ã§Þ§à§ä§â§Ö§ä§î §Ó§ã§ð §Ý§Ö§ß§ä§å §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ö§Û §á§à §Ü§Ñ§Ø§Õ§à§Þ§å §Ú§ã§ä§à§é§ß§Ú§Ü§å §Ú§ß§æ§à§â§Þ§Ñ§è§Ú§Ú §à§ä§Õ§Ö§Ý§î§ß§à §Ó §æ§à§â§Þ§Ñ§ä§Ö §Ü§Ñ§Ý§Ö§ß§Õ§Ñ§â§ñ §Ù§Ñ §Ý§ð§Ò§å§ð §Ó§í§Ò§â§Ñ§ß§ß§å§ð §Õ§Ñ§ä§å §Ú §á§Ö§â§Ú§à§Õ. §´§à§Ó§Ñ§â§í §Ú §å§ã§Ý§å§Ô§Ú §à§ä §â§Ö§Ü§Ý§Ñ§Þ§à§Õ§Ñ§ä§Ö§Ý§Ö§Û (§é§ä§à §Ú §Ô§Õ§Ö §Ü§å§á§Ú§ä§î §ã§Ö§Ô§à§Õ§ß§ñ §Ó §â§Ö§Ô§Ú§à§ß§Ö) §¯§Ö§Õ§Ñ§Ó§ß§à §á§â§à§ã§Þ§Ñ§ä§â§Ú§Ó§Ñ§Ý§Ú §Ó §â§Ö§Ü§Ý§Ñ§Þ§ß§í§ç §á§â§Ö§Õ§Ý§à§Ø§Ö§ß§Ú§ñ§ç: ? §á§à§Ú§ã§Ü§à§Ó§í§Û §Ú§ã§ä§à§é§ß§Ú§Ü §Ñ§Ü§ä§å§Ñ§Ý§î§ß§à§Û §Ú§ß§æ§à§â§Þ§Ñ§è§Ú§Ú §ß§Ö §ä§à§Ý§î§Ü§à §à §á§à§Ó§ã§Ö§Õ§ß§Ö§Ó§ß§à§Û §Ø§Ú§Ù§ß§Ú §£§Ñ§ê§Ö§Ô§à §Ô§à§â§à§Õ§Ñ §Ú §Ô§à§â§à§Õ§à§Ó §£§Ñ§ê§Ö§Ô§à §â§Ö§Ô§Ú§à§ß§Ñ, §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§ñ§ç, §ã§à§Ò§í§ä§Ú§ñ§ç §Ú §á§â§à§Ú§ã§ê§Ö§ã§ä§Ó§Ú§ñ§ç, §ß§à §Ú §á§Ñ§â§ä§ß§×§â§ã§Ü§Ñ§ñ §Ú§ß§ä§Ö§â§ß§Ö§ä-§Ó§Ú§ä§â§Ú§ß§Ñ §Ñ§Ü§ä§å§Ñ§Ý§î§ß§í§ç §ä§à§Ó§Ñ§â§ß§í§ç §á§â§Ö§Õ§Ý§à§Ø§Ö§ß§Ú§Û §ã §Õ§à§ã§ä§Ñ§Ó§Ü§à§Û §Ó §£§Ñ§ê§Ö§Þ §Ô§à§â§à§Õ§Ö. §¦§Ø§Ö§Õ§ß§Ö§Ó§ß§à §ß§Ñ §ß§Ñ§ê§Ö§Þ §ã§Ñ§Û§ä§Ö §á§à§ñ§Ó§Ý§ñ§Ö§ä§ã§ñ, §à§Ò§ß§à§Ó§Ý§ñ§Ö§ä§ã§ñ §Ú §Õ§à§á§à§Ý§ß§ñ§Ö§ä§ã§ñ §ã§Ñ§Þ§Ñ§ñ §ã§Ó§Ö§Ø§Ñ§ñ §Ú§ß§æ§à§â§Þ§Ñ§è§Ú§ñ §à §ä§à§Ó§Ñ§â§Ñ§ç §Ú §å§ã§Ý§å§Ô§Ñ§ç, §Ñ§Ü§è§Ú§ñ§ç §Ú §ã§Ü§Ú§Õ§Ü§Ñ§ç §ß§Ñ §ã§Ñ§Þ§í§Ö §â§Ñ§Ù§ß§í§Ö §ä§Ö§Þ§í §à§ä §ß§Ö§Õ§Ó§Ú§Ø§Ú§Þ§à§ã§ä§Ú §Ú §Ñ§Ó§ä§à§Þ§à§Ò§Ú§Ý§Ö§Û §Õ§à §â§Ñ§Ù§Ý§Ú§é§ß§í§ç §Ö§Ø§Ö§Õ§ß§Ö§Ó§ß§í§ç §å§ã§Ý§å§Ô, §Þ§à§Ò§Ú§Ý§î§ß§í§ç §á§â§Ú§Ý§à§Ø§Ö§ß§Ú§Û §Ú §ã§Ñ§Þ§í§ç §ã§Ó§Ö§Ø§Ú§ç §á§â§Ö§Õ§Ý§à§Ø§Ö§ß§Ú§Û §Þ§Ö§ã§ä§ß§í§ç §Ú§ß§ä§Ö§â§ß§Ö§ä-§Þ§Ñ§Ô§Ñ§Ù§Ú§ß§à§Ó §Ú §á§â§Ö§Õ§á§â§Ú§ñ§ä§Ú§Û §æ§Ñ§Ü§ä§Ú§é§Ö§ã§Ü§Ú §á§à §Ó§ã§Ö§Þ §Ô§à§â§à§Õ§Ñ§Þ §Ú §â§Ö§Ô§Ú§à§ß§Ñ§Þ §²§à§ã§ã§Ú§Ú, §µ§Ü§â§Ñ§Ú§ß§í, §¢§Ö§Ý§à§â§å§ã§ã§Ú§Ú §Ú §¡§Ò§ç§Ñ§Ù§Ú§Ú. §£§ã§Ö§Ô§Õ§Ñ ? §Ø§Ú§Ó§Ñ§ñ §Ú§ß§æ§à§â§Þ§Ñ§è§Ú§ñ, §Ó§ã§Ö§Ô§Õ§Ñ ? §Ñ§Ü§ä§å§Ñ§Ý§î§ß§í§Ö §è§Ö§ß§í. ? §ä§à§Ý§î§Ü§à §ã§Ó§Ö§Ø§Ú§Ö §Ú§ß§ä§Ö§â§ß§Ö§ä-§á§â§Ö§Õ§Ý§à§Ø§Ö§ß§Ú§ñ §Ó §â§Ö§Ô§Ú§à§ß§Ñ§ç (§Ö§Ø§Ö§Þ§Ú§ß§å§ä§ß§à§Ö §à§Ò§ß§à§Ó§Ý§Ö§ß§Ú§Ö §Ó §â§Ö§Ø§Ú§Þ§Ö §à§ß§Ý§Ñ§Û§ß). §¬§ä§à §ß§Ö §å§ã§á§Ö§Ý ? §ä§à§ä §à§á§à§Ù§Õ§Ñ§Ý, §Ü§ä§à §à§á§à§Ù§Õ§Ñ§Ý ? §ä§à§ä §à§ä§ã§ä§Ñ§Ý! §¢§å§Õ§î §Ó §Ü§å§â§ã§Ö §ß§à§Ó§à§Ô§à ? §è§Ö§ß§Ú §Ó§â§Ö§Þ§ñ! §±§â§à§Þ§Ö§Õ§Ý§Ú§ê§î §ä§í, §Õ§â§å§Ô§à§Û §å§ã§á§Ö§Ö§ä! ? §ß§à§Ó§í§Û §æ§à§â§Þ§Ñ§ä §á§à§Õ§Ñ§é§Ú §Ú§ß§æ§à§â§Þ§Ñ§è§Ú§Ú, §ß§à§Ó§í§Û §æ§à§â§Þ§Ñ§ä §ß§à§Ó§à§Ô§à §Ó§â§Ö§Þ§Ö§ß§Ú! §£ §Ü§Ñ§Ø§Õ§à§Þ §ã§Ý§à§Ó§Ö ? §Ù§ß§Ñ§é§Ö§ß§Ú§Ö, §Ó §Ü§Ñ§Ø§Õ§à§Þ §Ò§Ñ§ß§ß§Ö§â§Ö ? §ã§Þ§í§ã§Ý! §£§ã§ñ §Ú§ß§ä§Ö§â§ß§Ö§ä-§Ó§Ú§ä§â§Ú§ß§Ñ ? §Ù§Õ§Ö§ã§î. §±§à§ã§Ý§Ö§Õ§ß§Ú§Ö §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ú §ß§Ñ §ã§Ö§Ô§à§Õ§ß§ñ §á§à §£§Ñ§ê§Ö§Þ§å §Ô§à§â§à§Õ§å, §é§Ñ§ã§ä§ß§í§Ö §à§Ò§ì§ñ§Ó§Ý§Ö§ß§Ú§ñ, §ã§Ñ§Þ§í§Ö §á§à§Ý§ß§í§Ö §Ý§Ö§ß§ä§í §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ö§Û §à§ä §ß§Ñ§ê§Ú§ç §á§à§ã§ä§à§ñ§ß§ß§í§ç §Ñ§Ó§ä§à§â§à§Ó §Ó §Þ§à§Ò§Ú§Ý§î§ß§à§Þ §æ§à§â§Þ§Ñ§ä§Ö, §Ü§Ñ§Ý§Ö§ß§Õ§Ñ§â§ß§í§Û §Ñ§â§ç§Ú§Ó §ã§à§Ò§í§ä§Ú§Û §Ó §²§à§ã§ã§Ú§Ú, §µ§Ü§â§Ñ§Ú§ß§Ö §Ú §Þ§Ú§â§Ö, §á§à§á§å§Ý§ñ§â§ß§í§Ö §â§Ñ§Ù§Õ§Ö§Ý§í: §±§â§à§Ú§ã§ê§Ö§ã§ä§Ó§Ú§ñ, §³§á§à§â§ä, §¡§Ó§ä§à, §¤§Ý§Ñ§Þ§å§â, §¢§Ý§à§Ô§Ú §Ú §Õ§â§å§Ô§Ú§Ö §ã §á§â§ñ§Þ§í§Þ§Ú §á§Ö§â§Ö§ç§à§Õ§Ñ§Þ§Ú §ß§Ñ §á§Ö§â§Ó§à§Ú§ã§ä§à§é§ß§Ú§Ü§Ú - §á§â§à§ã§ä§à, §Õ§à§ã§ä§å§á§ß§à, §å§Õ§à§Ò§ß§à §å§Ø§Ö §ã§Ö§Ô§à§Õ§ß§ñ §Ú §ã§Ö§Û§é§Ñ§ã §ß§Ñ §á§Ý§Ñ§ä§æ§à§â§Þ§Ö §¯§Ú §à§Õ§Ú§ß §Ó§Ñ§ê §à§ä§Ù§í§Ó, §Ü§à§Þ§Þ§Ö§ß§ä§Ñ§â§Ú§Û §ß§Ö §à§ã§ä§Ñ§ß§Ö§ä§ã§ñ §ß§Ö§Ù§Ñ§Þ§Ö§é§Ö§ß§ß§í§Þ. §®§í §Ó§à§ã§á§â§Ú§Ú§Þ§é§Ú§Ó§í §Ü §Ý§ð§Ò§í§Þ §Ü§â§Ú§ä§Ú§é§Ö§ã§Ü§Ú§Þ §Ù§Ñ§Þ§Ö§é§Ñ§ß§Ú§ñ§Þ §Ú §á§â§Ö§Õ§Ý§à§Ø§Ö§ß§Ú§ñ§Þ §ã §Ó§Ñ§ê§Ö§Û §ã§ä§à§â§à§ß§í 24 §é§Ñ§ã§Ñ §Ó §ã§å§ä§Ü§Ú §Ú §Ó§ã§Ö 7 §Õ§ß§Ö§Û §Ó §ß§Ö§Õ§Ö§Ý§ð §Ò§Ö§Ù §Ó§í§ç§à§Õ§ß§í§ç §Ú §á§Ö§â§Ö§â§í§Ó§à§Ó §ß§Ñ §à§Ò§Ö§Õ. §®§à§Ò§Ú§Ý§î§ß§í§Û §Ó§Ñ§â§Ú§Ñ§ß§ä §á§â§à§Ö§Ü§ä§Ñ ? §Ù§Õ§Ö§ã§î. §¡§Ü§è§Ú§Ú, §ã§Ü§Ú§Õ§Ü§Ú, §â§Ñ§ã§á§â§à§Õ§Ñ§Ø§Ú, §Ø§×§Ý§ä§í§Ö §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ú (16+) §¯§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ú §á§à§ã§Ý§Ö§Õ§ß§Ö§Ô§à §é§Ñ§ã§Ñ §´§à§á-10 §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ö§Û §Ù§Ñ §ã§Ö§Ô§à§Õ§ß§ñ §ß§Ñ §ï§ä§à§ä §é§Ñ§ã: ? §Ò§í§ã§ä§â§Ö§Ö, §é§Ö§Þ §Á..., §ã§Ñ§Þ§í§Ö §ã§Ó§Ö§Ø§Ú§Ö §Ú §Ñ§Ü§ä§å§Ñ§Ý§î§ß§í§Ö §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ú §£§Ñ§ê§Ö§Ô§à §Ô§à§â§à§Õ§Ñ ? §Ü§Ñ§Ø§Õ§í§Û §Õ§Ö§ß§î, §Ü§Ñ§Ø§Õ§í§Û §é§Ñ§ã §ã §Ö§Ø§Ö§Þ§Ú§ß§å§ä§ß§í§Þ §à§Ò§ß§à§Ó§Ý§Ö§ß§Ú§Ö§Þ! §®§Ô§ß§à§Ó§Ö§ß§ß§Ñ§ñ §á§å§Ò§Ý§Ú§Ü§Ñ§è§Ú§ñ §ß§Ñ §ñ§Ù§í§Ü§Ö §à§â§Ú§Ô§Ú§ß§Ñ§Ý§Ñ, §Ò§Ö§Ù §Þ§à§Õ§Ö§â§Ñ§è§Ú§Ú §Ú §Ò§Ö§Ù §Ü§å§á§ð§â §Ó §â§Ñ§Ù§Õ§Ö§Ý§Ö §±§à§Ý§î§Ù§à§Ó§Ñ§ä§Ö§Ý§Ú §ã§Ñ§Û§ä§Ñ §¬§Ñ§Ü §Õ§à§Ò§Ñ§Ó§Ú§ä§î §ã§Ó§à§Ú §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ú §Ó §ß§Ñ§ê§Ú §ä§â§Ñ§ß§ã§Ý§ñ§è§Ú§Ú? §°§é§Ö§ß§î §á§â§à§ã§ä§à. §¥§à§ã§ä§Ñ§ä§à§é§ß§à §à§ä§á§â§Ñ§Ó§Ú§ä§î §Ù§Ñ§ñ§Ó§Ü§å §ß§Ñ §ß§Ñ§ê §ï§Ý§Ö§Ü§ä§â§à§ß§ß§í§Û §Ñ§Õ§â§Ö§ã §ã §å§Ü§Ñ§Ù§Ñ§ß§Ú§Ö§Þ §Ñ§Õ§â§Ö§ã§Ñ §£§Ñ§ê§Ö§Û §Ý§Ö§ß§ä§í §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ö§Û §Ó §æ§à§â§Þ§Ñ§ä§Ö RSS §Ú§Ý§Ú §á§à§Õ§Ñ§ä§î §Ù§Ñ§ñ§Ó§Ü§å §ß§Ñ §Ó§Ü§Ý§ð§é§Ö§ß§Ú§Ö §£§Ñ§ê§Ö§Ô§à §ã§Ñ§Û§ä§Ñ §Ó §ß§Ñ§ê §Ü§Ñ§ä§Ñ§Ý§à§Ô §é§Ö§â§Ö§Ù §æ§à§â§Þ§å. §±§à§ã§Ý§Ö §Þ§à§Õ§Ö§â§Ñ§è§Ú§Ú §Ù§Ñ§ñ§Ó§Ü§Ú §Ó §ä§Ö§é§Ö§ß§Ú§Ú 24 §é§Ñ§ã§à§Ó §£§Ñ§ê§Ñ §Ý§Ö§ß§ä§Ñ §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ö§Û §ß§Ñ§é§ß§×§ä §ä§â§Ñ§ß§ã§Ý§Ú§â§à§Ó§Ñ§ä§î§ã§ñ §Ó §â§Ñ§Ù§Õ§Ö§Ý§Ö §£§Ñ§ê§Ö§Ô§à §Ô§à§â§à§Õ§Ñ. §£§ã§Ö §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ú §Ó §ß§Ñ§ê§Ö§Û §Ý§Ö§ß§ä§Ö §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ö§Û §à§ä§ã§à§â§ä§Ú§â§à§Ó§Ñ§ß§í §á§à§Þ§Ú§ß§å§ä§ß§à §á§à §Ó§â§Ö§Þ§Ö§ß§Ú §á§å§Ò§Ý§Ú§Ü§Ñ§è§Ú§Ú, §Ü§à§ä§à§â§à§Ö §å§Ü§Ñ§Ù§Ñ§ß§à §ß§Ñ§á§â§à§ä§Ú§Ó §Ü§Ñ§Ø§Õ§à§Û §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ú §ã§á§â§Ñ§Ó§Ñ §ä§Ñ§Ü§Ø§Ö §Ü§Ñ§Ü §Ú §á§â§ñ§Þ§Ñ§ñ §ã§ã§í§Ý§Ü§Ñ §ß§Ñ §Ú§ã§ä§à§é§ß§Ú§Ü §Ú§ß§æ§à§â§Þ§Ñ§è§Ú§Ú. §¦§ã§Ý§Ú §å §£§Ñ§ã §Ö§ã§ä§î §Ú§ß§ä§Ö§â§Ö§ã§ß§í§Ö §æ§à§ä§à §£§Ñ§ê§Ö§Ô§à §Ô§à§â§à§Õ§Ñ §Ú§Ý§Ú §Õ§â§å§Ô§Ú§ç §ß§Ñ§ã§Ö§Ý§×§ß§ß§í§ç §á§å§ß§Ü§ä§à§Ó §£§Ñ§ê§Ö§Ô§à §â§Ö§Ô§Ú§à§ß§Ñ §Þ§í §ä§Ñ§Ü§Ø§Ö §Ô§à§ä§à§Ó§í §à§á§å§Ò§Ý§Ú§Ü§à§Ó§Ñ§ä§î §Ú§ç §Ó §â§Ñ§Ù§Õ§Ö§Ý§Ö §£§Ñ§ê§Ö§Ô§à §Ô§à§â§à§Õ§Ñ §Ó §ß§Ñ§ê§Ö§Þ §Ü§Ñ§ä§Ñ§Ý§à§Ô§Ö §â§Ö§Ô§Ú§à§ß§Ñ§Ý§î§ß§í§ç §ã§Ñ§Û§ä§à§Ó, §Ü§à§ä§à§â§í§Û §ß§Ñ §ã§Ö§Ô§à§Õ§ß§ñ§ê§ß§Ú§Û §Õ§Ö§ß§î §ñ§Ó§Ý§ñ§Ö§ä§ã§ñ §ã§Ñ§Þ§í§Þ §Ò§à§Ý§î§ê§Ú§Þ §â§Ö§Ô§Ú§à§ß§Ñ§Ý§î§ß§í§Þ §â§Ö§ã§å§â§ã§à§Þ, §à§ç§Ó§Ñ§ä§í§Ó§Ñ§ð§ë§Ú§Þ §Ó§ã§Ö §Ô§à§â§à§Õ§Ñ §ß§Ö §ä§à§Ý§î§Ü§à §²§à§ã§ã§Ú§Ú §Ú §µ§Ü§â§Ñ§Ú§ß§í, §ß§à §Ö§ë§× §Ú §¢§Ö§Ý§à§â§å§ã§ã§Ú§Ú §Ú §¡§Ò§ç§Ñ§Ù§Ú§Ú. §±§â§Ú§ã§Ý§Ñ§ä§î §æ§à§ä§à §Þ§à§Ø§ß§à §Ù§Õ§Ö§ã§î. §°§á§Ö§â§Ñ§ä§Ú§Ó§ß§à §â§Ñ§Ù§Þ§Ö§ã§ä§Ú§ä§î §ã§Ó§à§ð §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§î §Ó §Þ§à§Ø§ß§à §ã§Ñ§Þ§à§ã§ä§à§ñ§ä§Ö§Ý§î§ß§à §é§Ö§â§Ö§Ù §æ§à§â§Þ§å. §¥§â§å§Ô§Ú§Ö §á§à§á§å§Ý§ñ§â§ß§í§Ö §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ú §Õ§ß§ñ §ã§Ö§Ô§à§Õ§ß§ñ §´§à§á-4 §Ñ§ß§à§ß§ã§à§Ó §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ö§Û §à§ä §á§Ñ§â§ä§ß§×§â§à§Ó: ? §Ö§Ø§Ö§Õ§ß§Ö§Ó§ß§Ú§Ü §Ô§Ý§Ñ§Ó§ß§í§ç §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ö§Û §£§Ñ§ê§Ö§Ô§à §Ô§à§â§à§Õ§Ñ §Ú §£§Ñ§ê§Ö§Ô§à §â§Ö§Ô§Ú§à§ß§Ñ. - §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ú §Ó §Õ§Ö§ä§Ñ§Ý§ñ§ç, §ã§Ó§Ö§Ø§Ú§Û, §ß§Ö§Ù§Ñ§Þ§í§Ý§Ö§ß§ß§í§Û §à§Ò§â§Ñ§Ù §ã§à§Ò§í§ä§Ú§Û §Õ§ß§ñ, §Ñ§ß§Ñ§Ý§Ú§ä§Ú§Ü§Ñ §Þ§Ú§ß§å§Ó§ê§Ú§ç §ã§à§Ò§í§ä§Ú§Û, §á§â§à§Ô§ß§à§Ù§í §ß§Ñ §Ò§å§Õ§å§ë§Ö§Ö §Ú §ß§Ö§á§â§Ö§Õ§Ó§Ù§ñ§ä§í§Û §Ó§Ù§Ô§Ý§ñ§Õ §ß§Ñ §ß§Ñ§ã§ä§à§ñ§ë§Ö§Ö, §Ü§Ñ§Ü §Ó§ã§Ö§Ô§Õ§Ñ, §à§á§Ö§â§Ñ§ä§Ú§Ó§ß§à, §é§Ö§ã§ä§ß§à, §Ò§Ö§Ù §Ü§å§á§ð§â §Ú §è§Ö§ß§Ù§å§â§í §Ü§Ñ§Ø§Õ§í§Û §é§Ñ§ã, §ã§Ö§Þ§î §Õ§ß§Ö§Û §Ó §ß§Ö§Õ§Ö§Ý§ð, 24 §é§Ñ§ã§Ñ §Ó §ã§å§ä§Ü§Ú. §¦§ë§× §Ò§à§Ý§î§ê§Ö §Þ§Ö§ã§ä§ß§í§ç §Ô§à§â§à§Õ§ã§Ü§Ú§ç §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ö§Û §£§Ñ§ê§Ö§Ô§à §Ô§à§â§à§Õ§Ñ ? §ß§Ñ §á§à§â§ä§Ñ§Ý§Ñ§ç §Ú. §±§à§Ý§ß§Ñ§ñ §Ý§Ö§ß§ä§Ñ §â§Ö§Ô§Ú§à§ß§Ñ§Ý§î§ß§í§ç §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ö§Û §ß§Ñ §ï§ä§à§ä §é§Ñ§ã ? §Ù§Õ§Ö§ã§î. §³§Ñ§Þ§í§Ö §ã§Ó§Ö§Ø§Ú§Ö §Ú §á§à§á§å§Ý§ñ§â§ß§í§Ö §á§å§Ò§Ý§Ú§Ü§Ñ§è§Ú§Ú §ã§à§Ò§í§ä§Ú§Û §Ó §²§à§ã§ã§Ú§Ú §Ú §Ó §Þ§Ú§â§Ö §ã§Ö§Ô§à§Õ§ß§ñ - §Ó §´§°§±-100 §Ú §ß§Ñ §ã§Ñ§Û§ä§Ö. §³ 2017 §Ô§à§Õ§Ñ §á§â§à§Ö§Ü§ä §ã§ä§Ñ§Ý §Þ§å§Ý§î§ä§Ú§ñ§Ù§í§é§ß§í§Þ §Ú §â§Ñ§ã§ê§Ú§â§Ú§Ý §ã§Ó§à§ð §Ñ§å§Õ§Ú§ä§à§â§Ú§ð §Ó §Þ§Ú§â§à§Ó§à§Þ §á§â§à§ã§ä§â§Ñ§ß§ã§ä§Ó§Ö. §´§Ö§á§Ö§â§î §ß§Ñ§ã §é§Ú§ä§Ñ§Ö§ä §ß§Ö §ä§à§Ý§î§Ü§à §â§å§ã§ã§Ü§à§ñ§Ù§í§é§ß§Ñ§ñ §Ñ§å§Õ§Ú§ä§à§â§Ú§ñ §Ú §Ø§Ú§ä§Ö§Ý§Ú §Ò§í§Ó§ê§Ö§Ô§à §³§³§³§², §ß§à §Ú §Ó§Ö§ã§î §ã§à§Ó§â§Ö§Þ§Ö§ß§ß§í§Û §Þ§Ú§â. - §Þ§Ú§â §ß§à§Ó§à§ã§ä§Ö§Û §Ò§Ö§Ù §Ô§â§Ñ§ß§Ú§è §Ú §è§Ö§ß§Ù§å§â§í §Ó §â§Ö§Ø§Ú§Þ§Ö §â§Ö§Ñ§Ý§î§ß§à§Ô§à §Ó§â§Ö§Þ§Ö§ß§Ú. §¬§Ñ§Ø§Õ§å§ð §Þ§Ú§ß§å§ä§å - 123 §ã§Ñ§Þ§
¡ÈI believe him, not her.¡É - Joe Biden. Free Online Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own words of wisdom. Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words quotes. Critics Consensus No consensus yet. 29% TOMATOMETER Total Count: 14 98% Audience Score Verified Ratings: 55 Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words Ratings & Reviews Explanation Tickets & Showtimes The movie doesn't seem to be playing near you. Go back Enter your location to see showtimes near you. Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words Videos Movie Info Although Clarence Thomas remains a controversial figure, loved by some, reviled by others, few know much more than a few headlines and the recollections of his contentious confirmation battle with Anita Hill. With unprecedented access, the producers interviewed Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife, Virginia, for over 30 hours of interview time, over many months. Justice Thomas tells his entire life's story, looking directly at the camera, speaking frankly to the audience. After a brief introduction, the documentary proceeds chronologically, combining Justice Thomas' first person account with a rich array of historical archive material, period and original music, personal photos, and evocative recreations. Unscripted and without narration, the documentary takes the viewer through this complex and often painful life, dealing with race, faith, power, jurisprudence, and personal resilience. Rating: NR Genre: Directed By: Written By: In Theaters: Jan 31, 2020 limited Runtime: 116 minutes Studio: Manifold Productions Cast Critic Reviews for Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words Audience Reviews for Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words There are no featured audience reviews for Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words at this time. See All Audience Reviews Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words Quotes Movie & TV guides.
Released January 31, 2020 PG-13, 1 hr 56 min Documentary Tell us where you are Looking for movie tickets? Enter your location to see which movie theaters are playing Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words near you. ENTER CITY, STATE OR ZIP CODE GO Sign up for a FANALERT® and be the first to know when tickets and other exclusives are available in your area. Also sign me up for FanMail to get updates on all things movies: tickets, special offers, screenings + more. Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words: Trailer 1 1 of 1 Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words Synopsis With unprecedented access, the producers interviewed Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife, Virginia, for over 30 hours of interview time, over many months. Justice Thomas tells his entire life¡Çs story, looking directly at the camera, speaking frankly to the audience. Read Full Synopsis Movie Reviews Presented by Rotten Tomatoes More Info Rated PG-13 | For Some Sexual References and Thematic Elements.
Tuesday, February 11, 2020 Details RESERVE YOUR SEATS RIGHT HERE: A superb documentary delivers a measure of justice to an extraordinary justice. Among the most prominent figures in American politics, perhaps none is as poorly understood as Justice Clarence Thomas. Watching him tell his riveting story at length on camera for the first time, it becomes evident that the man has been deeply wronged ? maligned, disparaged, written off. Thomas may be the most famously silent public figure since Calvin Coolidge. But he has much to say in Michael Pack¡Çs excellent documentary Created Equal: Clarence Thomas in His Own Words, a measure of long-delayed redress for Thomas¡Çs reputation. Should Thomas remain on the high court until his 80th birthday, as has become common, he would become the longest-serving justice in U. S. history. May he have that last laugh.
Free online created equal: clarence thomas in his own words lyrics.
There is no way that lady made any of those things up you got some piece of s.
- ventolera.blogia.com/2020/021602-watch-full-created-equal-clarence-thomas-in-his-own-words-at-dailymotion-withou.php
- https://gumroad.com/l/download-full-created-equal-...
- www.sei.net sites/www.sei.net/sites/default/files/webform/created-equal-clarence-thomas-in-his-own-words-free-documentary-solar-movies-putlocker9-753.html/webform created-equal-clarence-thomas-in-his-own-words-free-documentary-solar-movies-putlocker9-753.html
- http://www.uwindsor.ca/alumni/sites/uwindsor.ca.al...
¥³¥á¥ó¥È¤ò¤«¤¯