Alexandra Bolde

Spy Intervention
4.0 (84%) 807 votes
Spy Intervention
*
? ☆???????????×?
?
? ????????×?????


Correspondent: Cine Trailers
Info: Retrouvez-ici toute l'actu des sorties ciné
Duration - 1Hour, 33 Min directed by - Drew Mylrea Creator - Lane Garrison, Mark Famiglietti countries - USA Spy Intervention is a movie starring Poppy Delevingne, Drew Van Acker, and Dave Sheridan. When the world's greatest spy meets the woman of his dreams, he abandons his adventurous existence and settles into the security of suburbia. Why does this hotel maid have blonde hair? Shes Cuban or Mexican… Same thing. Is it just me or did you use only 100 dollars for the whole movie. I understand this looks pathetically bad but why downvote the channel that was just posting it? Its not the channels fault it sucks? Wheres the logic.

&ref(https://res.cloudinary.com/leetchi/image/upload/c_fill,f_auto,fl_lossy,g_center,h_520,q_80,w_715/v1583583662/2ff159a8-87ba-49f2-86f1-7c3dacb5d6e8.jpg)

I am always interested in a good spy movie. What I am more interested in seeing is Paul Rudd in a more serious role. Welcome to Lost in the Sauce, keeping you caught up on political and legal news that often gets buried in distractions and theater. (the previous edition can be found here if you are super behind). House-keeping: How to read: the headings will guide you through this piece. The Main Course covers the “big” stories and The Sides covers the “smaller” stories. IF YOU FOLLOW THE NEWS CLOSELY: you likely know about the stories in the Main Course section, so you will be best served by scrolling down to The Sides portion. How to support: If you enjoy my work, please consider becoming a patron. I do this to keep track and will never hide behind a paywall, but these projects take a lot of time and effort to create. Even a couple of dollars a month helps. Since someone asked a few weeks ago (thank you! ), here's a PayPal option How to get notifications: If you’d like to be added to my newsletter, use this SIGNUP FORM and you’ll get these recaps in your inbox! Let’s dig in! MAIN COURSE Trump’s incompetence, authoritarian patterns continue with coronavirus response In a standalone piece published yesterday, I go over Trump’s response to the coronavirus, how he made the spread inevitable, and the impact of Trump’s authoritarian impulses. Nadler launches Barr investigation House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler sent Attorney General Bill Barr a letter last week requesting a slew of interviews and documents in preparation for Barr’s scheduled testimony at the end of March. Most notably, Nadler requested interviews with the four career prosecutors who withdrew from Roger Stone’s case after Barr intervened to recommend a lower sentence (which Stone received): Aaron Zelinsky, Adam Jed, Michael Marando, and Jonathan Kravis. John Durham, who is leading Barr’s investigation of the origins of the Russia probe, is also on the list, as is Jessie Liu, who supervised not only Stone’s case, but also the attempted prosecution of Andrew McCabe. “Although you serve at the president’s pleasure, you are also charged with the impartial administration of our laws. In turn, the House Judiciary Committee is charged with holding you to that responsibility. ” While it is likely that Barr won’t comply with many of these requests, Nadler may issue subpoenas directly to individuals of interest. As Democrats learned during the impeachment hearing, career officials are more likely to be forthright and honest about the Trump administration’s crimes and misdeeds. Court rulings McGahn’s testimony A divided three-judge panel of the D. C. Appeals Court dismissed the House Judiciary Committee’s lawsuit against former White House Counsel Don McGahn, ruling that federal courts have no role to play in disputes between the Executive and Legislative branches. The two judges who ruled in favor of the Trump administration - Thomas Griffith and Karen Henderson - were appointed by George W. Bush and George H. W. Bush, respectively. The pair write that Congress should use other tools to try to compel McGahn’s testimony: “Congress (or one of its chambers) may hold officers in contempt, withhold appropriations, refuse to confirm the President’s nominees, harness public opinion, delay or derail the President’s legislative agenda, or impeach recalcitrant officers. ” It should be mentioned that the majority does not mention the fact that during the impeachment trial Trump’s lawyers argued that Congress should pursue its subpoenas to executive branch witnesses in court. Judge Judith Rogers, a Bill Clinton appointee, wrote a lengthy dissent that is worth reading in full (starting on the 58th page of this document) “The court removes any incentive for the Executive Branch to engage in the negotiation process seeking accommodation, all but assures future Presidential stonewalling of Congress, and further impairs the House’s ability to perform its constitutional duties… Future presidents may direct wide-scale noncompliance with lawful congressional inquiries, secure in the knowledge that Congress can do little to enforce a subpoena dramatically undermining its ability to fulfill its constitutional obligations now and going forward. ” Unfair competition suit Trump also racked up a win in an “Emoluments-adjacent” lawsuit last week: a three-judge panel of the D. Appeals Court united to dismiss a wine bar’s claim that President Trump's D. hotel is unfairly undermining the business of other venues in the city. Judge Thomas Griffith, a George W. Bush appointee, and Reagan appointee Judge Stephen Williams joined Judge Merrick Garland in the ruling. Though it is undisputed that the wine bar has experienced a downturn since Trump took office ? his gilded hotel now attracting lobbyists, advocacy groups and diplomats who used to frequent the local business ? the appeals court said no evidence suggests that the president or his hotel interfered in Cork’s business. The lawsuit “boiled down to an assertion that businesses with famous proprietors cannot compete fairly ? a proposition alien to unfair-competition law, ” Griffith wrote summarizing the 2017 dismissal of the case by U. S. District Judge Richard Leon. Purge confirmed As I explained in last Sunday’s post, Trump is seeking to purge any disloyal officials from his administration. Newly-returned staffer John McEntee is leading the search for “Never Trumpers” with the assistance of a network of conservative activists including Ginni Thomas, the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. On Monday, White House spokesman Hogan Gidley confirmed that the White House is identifying employees seen as disloyal to force out of their positions. “It’s not a secret that we want people in positions that work with this president, not against him, and too often we have people in this government?I mean the federal government is massive, with millions of people?and there are a lot people out there taking action against this president and when we find them we will take appropriate action, ” Gidley said. “Time and time again we see in the media reports from people in the bowels of the federal government working against this president's been pretty clear about the fact he wants people in this administration who want to forward his agenda. Donald Trump was the only one elected. He was the only one that the American people voted for. They didn't vote for someone at any of these other agencies, any of these other departments. ” he said. Unqualified loyalists One of those purged from the administration, DNI Joseph Maguire, was fired for allowing his top aide to brief Congress on Russia’s intervention in the 2020 election to Trump’s benefit. Last week, Trump said he will nominate Republican Rep. John Ratcliffe to fill the position - again. Trump previously announced his intent to nominate Ratcliffe in July, but withdrew the nomination five days later after members of both parties questioned his qualifications. Ratcliffe rewind: Following Trump’s announcement last year, “key Republicans in Congress quickly signaled that Ratcliffe lacked the national security expertise that the job requires by law. ” Ratcliffe also lied to inflate his resume: “Records and interviews with former colleagues also showed that Ratcliffe had exaggerated his role in terrorism and immigration enforcement cases when he served as a federal prosecutor in Texas. During his campaign and on his congressional website, Ratcliffe had boasted that he ‘arrested 300 illegal immigrants on a single day. ’ That turned out not to be true. Former colleagues also said he didn’t play a significant role in a major terrorism case as he has claimed. ” ( WaPo or non-paywalled) The current acting-DNI, Ric Grenell, can only serve until March 11 unless a permanent replacement is formally submitted to the Senate for confirmation. The Federal Vacancies Reform Act allows Grenell to remain in position throughout the confirmation process and - should Ratcliffe fail - another 210 days after. If a second person is nominated, the clock “resets” again. To add onto previous reports of how massively inappropriate Grenell’s appointment is, ProPublica revealed that the new spy chief once got over $100, 000 from the Hungarian government, but never reported it. Failing to register as a foreign agent would normally be something the DOJ would jump at prosecuting. Senate Majority leader Chuck Schumer wrote a letter to the Justice Department last week asking the assistant attorney general for national security to "immediately investigate. " Grenell also wrote op-eds in 2016 defending Vladimir Plahotniuc, a Moldovan politician, and allegedly failed to disclose payments for his work on behalf of the oligarch. What is the play here? The White House may believe that Ratcliffe is likely to be confirmed because Grenell is so ill suited for the job that Ratcliffe looks better in comparison. Alternatively, Trump is likely comfortable with Grenell as acting-DNI. Knowing that he would never survive the confirmation process, Trump may be using the generous time limits of the Federal Vacancies Reform Act to circumvent the Senate to keep his unqualified loyalist in the position in an acting capacity. Rep. Robin Kelly, a member of the Oversight National Security subcommittee, introduced legislation last week that would mandate unconfirmed national security leaders testify before oversight committees every 45 days. “.. Administration has consistently used the ‘acting’ denotation to skirt these rules and limit Congressional oversight of our national American people deserve better. They deserve to know who is responsible for protecting their families and our security. Congress must hold these individuals and any Administration accountable to the highest level of oversight and transparency to protect our national security. ” The effect of Trump’s grip on in
Looks like a fake movie. Why is it filmed like this. Is this Queen and Slim but funny. Looks interesting.