Tiffany Johnson

Patterns of evidence: the red sea miracle song. Patterns of evidence: the red sea miracle cast. Patterns of evidence 3a the red sea miracle remix. Patterns of evidence the red sea miracle dvd. Filmmaker Tim Mahoney is a man on a mission, to find out the real history of the Exodus. Recently, I viewed a Fathom theatre event, showcasing his latest Patterns of Evidence film: The Red Sea Miracle. The Red Sea Miracle is part one of a two part set of films, the second to be scheduled for theatre release on May 5, 2020. In general, The Red Sea Miracle was ambitious, even for a 2 1/2 hour movie, but the storyline held together better than his last film, The Moses Controversy, which explored the possibility of how Moses might have been able to write the first five books of the Bible. Like the original film, The Exodus, which considered the chronology of Moses, and the timing of Joshua’s conquest of Canaan, this first part of the third film series, The Red Sea Miracle, looked at yet another controversial question, regarding the historicity of the Exodus, namely where the crossing of the “Red Sea” might have taken place. Overall, I found the newest film quite fascinating and encouraging, despite a few noticeable drawbacks. First, let us consider the good parts of the film. The Red Sea Miracle does a very good job at giving a helpful overview of the questions that archaeologists, Old Testament specialists, and other scholars are asking, when they try to determine where Moses might have led the Israelites across the “Red Sea. ” The amount of data to work through, both biblically and archaeologically, is quite a lot, and numerous interpretation challenges remain. So for a 2 1/2 hour film, Tim Mahoney is to be commended for his honesty, his warmth, his sincerity, and his determination, in helping viewers understand the complex issues involved. He also produced a cinematically pleasing movie to look at, a highly professional piece of film making that helped me to focus on the topic being addressed. Tim Mahoney also rightfully exposes viewers to a wide range of scholarship, in considering the question of where Moses might have parted the Red Sea. Anyone who has shown serious interest in Bible archaeology will know that the majority of archaeologists today are highly skeptical about the presence of Israelites in Egypt, much less who believe the traditional account of the Red Sea crossing. Mahoney interviews some of these scholars, but interestingly, he interviews one scholar, Manfred Bietak, one of today’s leading Austrian Egyptologists, who now believes that there is at least some evidence, that is consistent with the story of Israelites being slaves in ancient Egypt. When Mahoney interviewed Bietak, over a decade ago, for the first Patterns of Evidence film, The Exodus, it was Bietak’s skepticism regarding the historicity of the Exodus story, that first discouraged Tim Mahoney in his film making journey. In addition to some skeptical scholars, Mahoney also interviews a wide range of evangelical Christian scholars, who hold various, and even conflicting views, as to where the Red Sea crossing might have occurred. Mahoney divides these scholars into two broadly-defined camps: those who favor the “Egyptian” view, and those who favor the “Hebrew” view. The “Egyptian” view, generally speaking, favors a crossing of the “Reed” Sea, through the shallow lake region, within a few dozen miles of Egypt, with perhaps as few as 20, 000 or so Israelites. The “Hebrew” view favors a crossing at the Gulf of Aqaba, over 200 miles away from Egypt, on the eastern side of the Sinai peninsula, with over 2 million Israelites. The “Egyptian” view favors the traditional location of Mount Sinai, on the Sinai peninula, whereas the “Hebrew” view favors Mount Sinai being in Saudi Arabia. I was surprised to discover, that unlike the two previous Mahoney films, Mahoney is now less enamored with the ideas proposed by Egyptologist David Rohl, who Mahoney tends to elevate highly in the first two films. David Rohl, who considers himself to be an atheist, is a genuine, peer-reviewed scholar, but his unconventional revision of Egyptian chronology has yet to gain significant support from his other historian and archaeologist colleagues, from within the scholarly guild. This is important, for a viewer of the first two films might be erroneously drawn to conclude that David Rohl’s proposals carry far greater weight, in academic circles, than is actually the case. One can not simply dismiss David Rohl’s ideas out of hand, but a lot more work needs to be done before Rohl’s proposals gain broader acceptance. Interestingly, I found it quite telling that David Rohl is highly skeptical of the “Hebrew, ” Gulf of Aqaba crossing view. He tells Mahoney that he would need to see an actual chariot wheel dug up from the floor of the Gulf of Aqaba, before he would accept a “Red Sea” crossing, at that location. I was also glad that Mahoney did not mention Ron Wyatt in the film, the late adventurer and fringe archaelogist, who made a big splash years ago by reportedly spotting such a chariot wheel on the bottom of the Gulf of Aqaba floor. The shenanigans of Ron Wyatt have brought a lot of Christian attempts at archaeology into ill-repute, making for an unnecessary stumbling block for some regarding the Gospel. Thankfully, Mahoney did his best to interview top, well-regarded scholars in the field instead. Despite the film’s many strengths, there was one aspect that stuck out as a major criticism of The Red Sea Miracle. Mahoney clearly favors the “Hebrew” over and against the “Egyptian” view of the crossing. He believes that a shallow lake crossing, with a relatively smaller number of Israelites, is somehow less “miraculous” than a Gulf of Aqaba crossing. This is really peculiar, as it assumes that the bigger the miracle, the more miraculous it would be, and therefore, the more Scripturally faithful it would be. I get the point that Tim Mahoney is trying to make, but it is not necessary to make such a point, in the interest of defending the Bible. Sure, if Moses took over 2 million Israelites across the Red Sea, Cecil B. DeMille-style, even somewhere relatively deep, like the Gulf of Aqaba, then God can do anything. Who are we to put limits upon God? But a smaller event is still a miracle. To conclude that today’s shallow lake region near Egypt is unsuitable for a crossing, assumes that Pharoah’s army could not have drowned in only a “few feet of water. ” Nevertheless, storm surges can still kill a lot of people, even in relatively shallow areas. Just consider how at least 6, 000 died during the 1900 hurricane to hit Galveston, Texas, with an 8 to 12 foot storm surge. Yet even if a more naturalistic explanation could be found for the Red Sea crossing, the timing of such an event, such as a large wind separating the waters, at just the right time, is still miracle enough, and thoroughly demonstrates the power of God. Did Moses simply get lucky that the sea parted, just when he got to the water’s edge? Or was this, too, evidence that points to the providence and power of God? Consider the story of the Risen Jesus: If God really wanted to show a grand miracle of Resurrection, he could have Resurrected thousands upon thousands of people on Easter morning. That would have been a much more impressive miracle. But it was sufficient for God to demonstrate his overwhelming power and victory over sin and death, by Resurrecting the one God-Man, Jesus Christ. Does not God have the right to demonstrate his miraculous power, however God wishes to do so? Unfortunately, Mahoney did not adequately address some of the weaknesses of the Gulf of Aqaba crossing proposal, that is rejected by a greater number of evangelical scholars. Alas, there is only so much you can do in such a long film, and still hold people’s attention, even with an intermission midway through the theatre showing. Dr. Michael Heiser, for example, notes that a Gulf of Aqaba crossing presents a number of problems when trying to reconcile certain chronological aspects of the journey through the Wilderness, such as where the Israelites obtained water from a rock. In other words, the issues are a lot more complex than most realize (which is partly why the controversy over the location of the Red Sea crossing continues to perplex even the best evangelical scholars). To be fair, while Tim Mahoney still appears to favor what he calls a “Hebrew” view, he rightly acknowledges that different evangelical scholars hold some widely differing perspectives, in good faith, on this most interesting topic. The last half hour of the film was a panel discussion, held at the Answers in Genesis Ark Encounter, in Kentucky, where some Christian leaders reflected on the film, including Truett McConnell University Old Testament scholar Jeremy Lyon, radio talk show host Janet Mefferd, Precepts founder Kay Arthur, and Answers in Genesis’ Ken Ham. What was interesting about this panel is that all four participants interviewed are all Young Earth Creationists. Yet perhaps the larger majority of scholars interviewed in The Red Sea Miracle do not hold a Young Earth Creationist interpretation of the Bible. Is this perhaps a sign of a rapprochement between advocates of Young Earth Creationism and Old Earth Creationism? It made me curious. All in all, I enjoyed The Red Sea Miracle, despite what I detected to be noticeable flaws. The exact location of where the Israelites crossed the Red Sea is not a critical matter of faith, nor is the exact size of the Israelite nation as they crossed it. At the same time, considering these issues would help believers to gain a greater interest in studying Scripture, as well providing helpful conversat
Published: 10 February 2020 (GMT+10) Atheists often attack the truth of the Bible by claiming there is no evidence of biblical events that should have left evidence, such as the Israelites in Egypt and the Exodus. Tim Mahoney’s excellent Patterns of Evidence series (see the reviews of the first two films entitled Exodus and The Moses Controversy) have laid out an argument that some scholars do not see the evidences of biblical history because they are not looking for evidence of any Hebrew occupation or are interpreting evidence incorrectly by assigning it to the wrong times. The latest installment, Patterns of Evidence: The Red Sea Miracle continues this trend. God’s miraculous deliverance of Israel from Egypt including the plagues on Egypt and the parting of the Red Sea was foundational to Israel’s identity as a nation in covenant with Yahweh and their understanding of who God was. These miracles were also of such great magnitude that even the Canaanites remembered it a generation later (Joshua 2:10). But nearly every geographical location surrounding the event is contested?particularly the site of the crossing itself, and the route Israel took to get there. Using the personal, engaging format of the previous documentaries, Mahoney speaks with experts representing all the major views. In this film, they are divided into the ‘Egyptian view’, that tends to view the population of Israel, the distance traveled, and the scale of the Red Sea miracle as smaller, and sometimes a naturalistic event, rather than the supernatural intervention of God. Then he explains what he terms as the ‘Hebrew view’, which views the population, distance, and scale of the miracle as larger. While this characterization might seem simplistic, it is accurate enough for the purposes of the documentary, and makes the debate much more understandable for the ‘uninitiated’ viewer. Size of the Israelite population A ‘literal’ translation of the Hebrew text is that the Exodus consisted of 650, 000 men plus women and children, meaning around 2 million people. But the Egyptian view argues that the word translated ‘thousand’ (elef) may also have the non-literal meaning ‘family group’, bringing the numbers down to several thousand, not millions. Mahoney does a particularly good job giving the Egyptian view scholars a fair representation, including OT scholar Barry Beitzel who had a good amount of screen time to argue for his understanding. But Mahoney also does a good job of presenting a compelling case for understanding “thousand” literally, using the principle of Scripture to interpret Scripture. Red Sea or Reed Sea? The Hebrew term for the body of water that the Israelites crossed on dry land is Yam Suph. We translate that term as “Red Sea” based on the Greek translation of the Old Testament, the Septuagint. But Mahoney argues persuasively that the actual meaning is “Reed Sea”. Martin Luther also reflected this understanding when he used the German Schilfmeer, which means “sea of reeds”. It is necessary to pre-empt a possible skeptical attack here, because Acts 7:36 and Hebrews 11:29 use the Septuagintal Greek term for Red Sea. If the Hebrew was “Reed Sea”, and the Septuagint translators got it wrong, then the New Testament would be in error for using that term. How do we defend the NT usage if Yam Suph means “Reed Sea”? The simple answer is that place names change over time, and updates to reflect later designations are common in Scripture. Yam Suph was the correct name at the time of Moses, and Red Sea reflected the Greek name in usage at the time of the Septuagint translation and the New Testament. We see this elsewhere in Egypt where Avaris, the Hyksos capital, was later built over and renamed Ramses and even Pi-Ramses, which is what we read in our Bibles today. The crossing site? There are three major candidates for the general area of the Red Sea Crossing Some people argue that north of the Red Sea, there are some relatively shallow bodies of water that qualify. The Gulf of Suez is the major traditional crossing site, with most traditional Christian commentators supporting it. The Gulf of Aqaba is a site that is gaining popularity, especially among some researchers outside the mainstream archaeological community. There are three places in the Gulf of Aqaba where the crossing could have possibly happened. Closely linked to this is the route Israel took to get there. The discussion of how fast people and herds could possibly travel and the implications for the crossing site is particularly enlightening. A high-quality visual masterpiece Often, biblical debates can be confusing and difficult to understand for those new to the subject. And there are those who feel that they have settled these matters in their own minds and are perhaps resistant to other views. But Mahoney walks the viewer through the various options in a way that is very understandable and leaves one feeling like they have the information necessary to form their own well-informed opinion. The production value is also very high, with stunning video and graphics. Why does it matter? For Mahoney, this isn’t just a dry academic discussion. He stated in previous Patterns of Evidence installments that he needed answers to these questions for his own faith, and in this film he says that he wants to have answers for his grandchildren. This drives it home that the Bible’s history matters, and we should want to be able to defend it with all the tools at our disposal. Patterns of Evidence: The Red Sea Miracle adds several arguments that we can use to defend the Bible’s history and does much to build our faith in the accuracy of the Bible’s account. For those who’ve had some doubts about God’s parting of the Red/Reed sea, this film should be a faith-building encounter at the greatness of our God. After all, if He is the one that created this massive universe, why should parting a body of water on the earth, regardless of its size, be so difficult? We heartily recommend Patterns of Evidence: The Red Sea Miracle.

Patterns of evidence: the red sea miracle plant. This Bible-affirming investigation is so large that two films were required. It’s one of the greatest miracles in the Bible; Moses and the Israelites trapped at the sea by Pharaoh’s army when God miraculously parts the waters, rescuing the Israelites and destroying Pharaoh and his chariots. But is there any evidence that it really happened and if so, where? That’s what investigative filmmaker Timothy Mahoney set out to discover 18 years ago and now he is ready to share what’s been uncovered; a controversy between two dramatically different approaches in reading the biblical text. One approach is Egyptian, the other is Hebrew. Both will lead to two very different conclusions on the location of the Exodus crossing site and the cause of the miraculous parting of the sea. What do these different approaches tell us about miracles ? and what do they tell us about God? Run Time: 2 hours 30 minutes #PatternsOfEvidence #RedSeaMiracle Categories: Inspirational. Patterns of evidence: the red sea miracle book. Patterns of evidence the red sea miracle movie trailer.

Patterns of evidence: the red sea miracle full. Patterns of evidence the red sea miracle - part 1. Patterns of evidence 3a the red sea miracle karaoke. Patterns of evidence: the red sea miracle free. I'm ready cross over I need 2nd chance ???. Patterns of evidence the red sea miracle part 1. Patterns of evidence 3a the red sea miracle new. Patterns of evidence: the red sea miracle man. Patterns of Evidence: The Red Sea miracle de la grossesse. It's a very good lesson. Thank GOD... I would love to metal detect on that area near the beach where the road is very narrow. There is bound to be things they dropped with millions walking through there.?.
Patterns of evidence 3a the red sea miracle lyrics.

&ref(https://media1.fdncms.com/orlando/imager/u/r-poster/26688889/the-rhythm-section?cb=1579768157) Ron wyatt discovered the ark of noah i have no doubt about that, but the mount sinai was called the mountain of moses by the locals long before ron wyatt was born so he didnt discover it. Patterns of evidence the red sea miracle showtimes. Patterns of evidence the red sea miracle regal. Patterns of evidence the red sea miracle part i. Patterns of evidence the red sea miracle tickets. Patterns of evidence: the red sea miracle tree.
Patterns of evidence: the red sea miracle house. Patterns of evidence the red sea miracle movie times. Patterns of evidence the red sea miracle online.

Patterns of Evidence: The Red Sea miracle contre.

Patterns of evidence the red sea miracle watch online. Patterns of evidence the red sea miracle ii. Patterns of evidence the red sea miracle trailer. Patterns of evidence the red sea miracle 2. It was entertaining when I watched it as a kid back in the early 60's - I learned a lot since. It's amusing and funny to me now. Patterns of evidence: the red sea miracle movie. Patterns of evidence the red sea miracle download.

Patterns of evidence: the red sea miracle game. Eccellente. Tomorrow (February 18) is your only opportunity to see the incredible documentary Patterns of Evidence: The Red Sea Miracle Part I in theaters. This powerful film about the miraculous crossing of the Red Sea is only in US theaters one night, and you don’t want to miss it! With this new documentary, filmmaker Tim Mahoney explores the historicity of this incredible miracle as he seeks to discover if it really happened. Many view the crossing of the Red Sea as a great story, and the fodder for some great films. However, they might not see it a historical event. And yet Scripture refers to it over and over again as not only real history but as a powerful miracle that saved God’s people and destroyed their enemies. With this new documentary, filmmaker Tim Mahoney explores the historicity of this incredible miracle as he seeks to discover if it really happened. Did the exodus really happen? How many people were involved? Where did they cross the Red Sea? Is there any archaeological evidence of this event? And we have a special treat for you immediately after the film. Todd Starnes will be moderating a post-movie panel discussion featuring Kay Arthur, Jeremy Lyons, Janet Mefferd, and me. This discussion was filmed before a live audience at the 2, 500-seat Answers Center at the Ark Encounter. You won’t want to miss it! And The Red Sea Miracle, Part II will be in US theaters May 5, 2020, so be sure to mark your calendars and reserve tickets for that showing?you don’t want to catch part one and miss part two! I encourage you to go and see this film tomorrow. Find all the details, and a theater near you, at. Thanks for stopping by and thanks for praying, Ken This item was written with the assistance of AiG’s research team.

• https://www.bizcommunity.com/Profile/PatternsofEvi...
• www.bizcommunity.com/Profile/DownloadPatternsofEvidence:
• https://ordenmutantes.blogia.com/2020/032101-onlin...
• https://www.bizcommunity.com/Profile/WatchStreamPa...
• https://wwwmariela.blogia.com/2020/032201--streami...
• https://amp.amebaownd.com/posts/7951677
• www.bizcommunity.com/Profile/WatchFullPatternsofEvidenc
• https://seesaawiki.jp/danpon/d/!no%20sign%20up!%20...
• quelees.blogia.com/2020/032101--release-date-patterns-of-evidence-the-red-sea-miracle-watch-full-length.php

1. Writer: Americans Shrugged
2. Biography: Rabbits are NOT cute/cuddly and chickens attack, both deserve to be eaten. Lighten up, deal with it, forget about it #thebeesKnow #andThenILaughed #Q #KAG
3.